Also, Rose was unlucky in one paper, while Stones was at fault
One plays for Spurs, the other doesn't
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, Rose was unlucky in one paper, while Stones was at fault
Tell that to Raphael Varane though? Or Laporte? Or that lad at Hoffenheim whose name I can't remember? Or Marquinhos at PSG? Or Gimenez at Atletico/Uruguay? More to be mentioned here, but that's just off the top of my head.
Or as far as goalkeepers go - De Gea, Courtois, ter Stegen, Hart, Butland... Loads of others are first teamers and also national keepers and are under or around 25 with 100-odd games under their belts.
The above statement is only half-right (at best) now, and people should stop being under the illusion that it's still like that. Perhaps back in the day (LOL @ Goat's Baresi comparison) it was like that, but now? Not really. Age barrier is very much lowered with the newer generations - you've got access to technologies and training (and doping drugs @FCBarça ) that just wasn't around before, it's only natural players develop quicker.
Only saw it briefly but it seems to me he slipped trying to do some flashy dribble when a safer option like a back pass was available?
Come on now, you know very well there is a big difference between where such incidents took place. Stones looks fine when playing passes closer to the centre circle. Things go awry when playing passes near his own area (and usually towards his own goal).but as the commentators pointed out, him coming out of the back with the ball doing just that is what created the england goal.
take the smooth with the rough.
Rose probably was unlucky. Stones was at fault. He wasn't under pressure. The simple pass to Forster was on. He was last man. He got caught fannying about in the wrong place, at the wrong time. Lesson needs to be learnt
Come on now, you know very well there is a big difference between where such incidents took place. Stones looks fine when playing passes closer to the centre circle. Things go awry when playing passes near his own area (and usually towards his own goal).
All signs continue to point to him being utilised in defensive midfield. Replacement for Barry perhaps?
You can say that pabbers, but it's about decision making. The benefits of an eye catching turn on the edge of the area do not outweigh the risks if it goes wrong. There's a time and a place for the fancy stuff and he needs to learn that - we've seen it at Goodson as well. Saying that, he's young and he's worth being patient with while he learns the game. No problem with the press pointing out his error though.
Ball ended up in the back of the net. It happens. Was it avoidable? Easily.He slipped.
It happens.
Ball ended up in the back of the net. It happens. Was it avoidable? Easily.
Don't disagree with any of that, other than the get a grip bit. People react to criticism of our players in an overly defensive way. No need.Yes it was.
Pretty much every goal is 'avoidable'...
Was the slip avoidable, yeh, of course...
Was Rose lunging out with his arms flying everywhere after Forster had made the stop - yeh, it was...
Get a grip pal.
I don't give a jot about England in all honesty.
Other than the mistake, which led to Danny Rose conceding the penalty, Stones had a solid game and a decent return to international footy and a good 90 minutes, as well as instigating England's goal and setting up what should have been a second if Walcott was any good.
Don't disagree with any of that, other than the get a grip bit. People react to criticism of our players in an overly defensive way. No need.
Only saw it briefly but it seems to me he slipped trying to do some flashy dribble when a safer option like a back pass was available?
I like John, but this is a bit early mate ?