Well worst case it’s an irrelevant read - which I can live with!Not if he doesn’t take over!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well worst case it’s an irrelevant read - which I can live with!Not if he doesn’t take over!
Yes, the reason Harris and Blitzer havent is they JUST bought the Washington Commanders for 4.7 billion last year(with other owners) and they are knee deep in rebuilding that franchise which needed a complete overhaul.Decent interview just released on ToffeeTV with Palace fan Dan Cook (HLTCO) about the current Textor / board situation.
One thing I haven’t seen asked / discussed… is there a particular reason why the other two American’s at Palace (Harris and Blitzer) haven’t bought Textor’s shares off him? If those two are more aligned with Parish’s way of doing things, wouldn’t it be in those three’s interests (Parish, Harris and Blitzer) for the additional shares to be held amongst themselves?
I know someone new coming in could only acquire 45% so would only have a minority anyway, so is it a case that those 3 don’t really care who buys them, as nothing will really change regardless of who buys them?
@Alan Whittle any idea mate?
Edit: it looks like between the 3 Americans and Parish, they hold 75% of the shares. Who owns the other 25%? Is the 25% made up of small minority private holders, similar to at Everton? Has Textor tried to acquire his needed 6% extra from that pool?
No, the Lyon bit is not made up, that’s not what I said. Claiming the credit for getting him to Palace (which, in part, he is doing, despite having no say in day to day matters) is the made up (or at least highly exaggerated) part.It was reported last summer that glasner was going to Lyon so it’s definitely not just made up after the event. Getting his man to be manager and him doing well might just have made him even more convinced that he should have more of a say over what happens.
I thought it was a bit sour grapes from him, kept going on the multi club model and he wouldn’t like that, must be gutted he has 3 billionaires on the board worth over 15 billion who hardly have a say.Decent interview just released on ToffeeTV with Palace fan Dan Cook (HLTCO) about the current Textor / board situation.
One thing I haven’t seen asked / discussed… is there a particular reason why the other two American’s at Palace (Harris and Blitzer) haven’t bought Textor’s shares off him? If those two are more aligned with Parish’s way of doing things, wouldn’t it be in those three’s interests (Parish, Harris and Blitzer) for the additional shares to be held amongst themselves?
I know someone new coming in could only acquire 45% so would only have a minority anyway, so is it a case that those 3 don’t really care who buys them, as nothing will really change regardless of who buys them?
@Alan Whittle any idea mate?
Edit: it looks like between the 3 Americans and Parish, they hold 75% of the shares. Who owns the other 25%? Is the 25% made up of small minority private holders, similar to at Everton? Has Textor tried to acquire his needed 6% extra from that pool?
Well that wasn't what you said either if we're going to be like that about it.No, the Lyon bit is not made up, that’s not what I said. Claiming the credit for getting him to Palace (which, in part, he is doing, despite having no say in day to day matters) is the made up (or at least highly exaggerated) part.
No, the Lyon bit is not made up, that’s not what I said. Claiming the credit for getting him to Palace (which, in part, he is doing, despite having no say in day to day matters) is the made up (or at least highly exaggerated) part.
Agree but it could be a Kenwright like situation where Parish just has a vice like grip over everything.Doesn't he own 45% of the club? Largest shareholder?
Find it hard to believe he wouldn't have input into key decisions - even if they like to say to fans it's all Steve 10% Parish.
Ok mate.Well that wasn't what you said either if we're going to be like that about it.
Agree but it could be a Kenwright like situation where Parish just has a vice like grip over everything.
Yeah. That’s why he’s selling.Doesn't he own 45% of the club? Largest shareholder?
Find it hard to believe he wouldn't have input into key decisions - even if they like to say to fans it's all Steve 10% Parish.
Yeah. That’s why he’s selling.
Where have I said he doesn’t have any input? He’s selling because, in his opinion, he doesn’t have enough. That is demonstrably true, and I have repeated that on both this thread and the 777 thread.A board member, and largest shareholder who doesn't have any input?
Next you'll be telling me he doesn't even get a directors vote.