John Textor

[Damo_1878]

If anyone wants to understand the Sanctions regime

I suggest to go read the G7 Sanctions plan

Plus there is an increasing effort to target the war machine and there is no prospect whatsoever of its removal

https://www.reuters.com/world/g7-plans-warn-small-chinese-banks-over-russia-ties-sources-say-2024-06-09/

 

[Damo_1878]

The West is a de facto belligerent, hence the sanctions from the West against Russia. You will also hear the West being referred to by Russia when they cite their reasons for going to war in the first place. The West is heavily involved in the conflict, and the West will be heavily involved in the conflict’s ending. They will be heavily involved in peace negotiations.

I accept that the relative strength of each party will make a difference when negotiating. A defeated party won’t be able to negotiate anything. But a stalemate were nobody is winning and everybody is losing could allow for flexibility in negotiation, and neither you or I know whether the blanket ban on all Russian entities doing business with the West will be up for discussion or not.

Personally, I think it will be up for discussion when it comes to the negotiation of peace, and I don’t expect the blanket ban on all Russian entities to continue indefinitely.

I'm afraid you're wrong in that thinking

The West are also not belligerents. If we were we would be at war with Russia. But we are not

 

[Dublin blue 75]

Again. You're misreading the situation entirely

There is no imminent prospect of sanctions being removed even if Putin were removed tomorrow

I'm not saying there is any such imminent potential. In the world of realpolitik however, all options will be on the table if any when the dwarf is toppled. It's well known that he is supported by a circle of several oligarchs with tawdry histories. Any regime change is likely to start with and, at least include, one of those and they will be a feature in settlement negotiations.

To the extent that extends to include specific oligarchs who may have influence with Everton or any other clubs, that's anyones guess and won't be clear until we get to a post current Russian leadership situation. The outcome of the US election in November is also a key factor. Nothing is imminent.

 

[Dymak]

I'm afraid you're wrong in that thinking

The West are also not belligerents. If we were we would be at war with Russia. But we are not

Are you a full-time blert, or just a part-time one?

You are supposedly legally trained, and yet you are presenting like a giddy moron when you feel the need to differentiate between ‘de jure’ and ‘de facto’ belligerents in a war.

To act like the West are not intrinsically involved in this war is just faux naïf, I’m afraid.

 

[Jimishorts]

Are you a full-time blert

Definitely full-time.

Does double shifts on match days.

 

[Damo_1878]

Are you a full-time blert, or just a part-time one?

You are supposedly legally trained, and yet you are presenting like a giddy moron when you feel the need to differentiate between ‘de jure’ and ‘de facto’ belligerents in a war.

To act like the West are not intrinsically involved in this war is just faux naïf, I’m afraid.

There are only two belligerents. Russia (the aggressor) and Ukraine.

That is fact. Whether you think I'm a "blert" or not

 

[Damo_1878]

Definitely full-time.

Does double shifts on match days.

You won't find me on here of a match day.

I go the game

 

[Jimishorts]

You won't find me on here of a match day.

I go the game

Oh dear telling porkies again?

Plus 2 more pages of waffling content from that day.

 

[Damo_1878]

Oh dear telling porkies again?

View attachment 272582

That was after the game

 

[Dymak]

There are only two belligerents. Russia (the aggressor) and Ukraine.

That is fact. Whether you think I'm a "blert" or not

I’m not doing this.

I’m not going to argue with a moron that is pretending to misunderstand the difference between de jure and de facto, especially when said moron is making his own references to the G7 discussing the possibility of sanctions against China due to the alleged assistance that China is providing to Russia’s war effort.

Have a day off, mate!

 

[Jimishorts]

That was after the game

No one for details are you dear.

You won't find me on here of a match day.

 

[Damo_1878]

No one for details are you dear.

You've found me complaining to @Goat about getting beat 3-2 after the game. Well done to you

 

[Damo_1878]

I’m not doing this.

I’m not going to argue with a moron that is pretending to misunderstand the difference between de jure and de facto, especially when said moron is making his own references to the G7 discussing the possibility of sanctions against China due to the alleged assistance that China is providing to Russia’s war effort.

Have a day off, mate!

"Have a day off" that was yesterday mate

You've come on spouting that sanctions removal is on the table. It's nonsense because there is no chance of that. Even if Donald Trump got in the White House.

 

[Bryan+]

Oh dear telling porkies again?

View attachment 272582

Plus 2 more pages of waffling content from that day.

Oh look Damo proven to be a liar once again, Damo Trump.

 

[Jimishorts]

You've found me complaining to @Goat about getting beat 3-2 after the game. Well done to you

Muchas gracias.