Joleon Lescott

Sell Lescott?

  • Yes, for £18m to £20m - with all money being given to Moyes to spend

    Votes: 116 45.0%
  • No way - we must keep him at the club.

    Votes: 142 55.0%

  • Total voters
    258
Status
Not open for further replies.
As said, I'm not blind for the obvious. I do understand we need major investment to stand any chance of challenging the Sky four on a regular basis. Shouldn't be all about the money though. I prefer building for success with Spurs/Villa like money, instead of looking for the quick fix, as done by City.

But you're on a slippery slope when you highlight those teams and their level of investment. They could each be accused of attempting to leapfrog other clubs by using the financial muscle of their owners. I dont think there's any middle ground to be held onto here. You either argue for a purist approach that looks to nurture local talent and use the tv revenue to back that up and maybe buy younger, unproven (and therefore les expensive) talent from elsewhere, or you just embrace the view that buying established talent is the realistic way to win and welcome the men with the biggest pockets.


As for the situation with AZ in Holland. AZ is the first and only club in Holland that's 100% owned by one person. Multi millionaire Dirk Scheringa, owner of the Dutch SNS bank group. He put a lot of money into AZ and is able to match both PSV and Ajax with wages for players. So, it's the same situation as in England really, only on a much smaller scale than compared to the English PL.

Fair enough. I didn't realise that.
 
But you're on a slippery slope when you highlight those teams and their level of investment. They could each be accused of attempting to leapfrog other clubs by using the financial muscle of their owners. I dont think there's any middle ground to be held onto here. You either argue for a purist approach that looks to nurture local talent and use the tv revenue to back that up and maybe buy younger, unproven (and therefore les expensive) talent from elsewhere, or you just embrace the view that buying established talent is the realistic way to win and welcome the men with the biggest pockets.

I do think there's a middle way though. One consisting of buying the best young national/international prospects (Defour/Moutinho/Elm ect..etc...) and bringing through top talent through your own academy (Rooney/Rodwell/Baxter). Much the way Arsenal are doing for many years now.
 
I do think there's a middle way though. One consisting of buying the best young national/international prospects (Defour/Moutinho/Elm ect..etc...) and bringing through top talent through your own academy (Rooney/Rodwell/Baxter). Much the way Arsenal are doing for many years now.

That would be fine, but we cant afford even those players.
 

That would be fine, but we cant afford even those players.

Sorry MG, really like you, but cant you read?

I do realise we need investment to take that next step. I'm not against that investment in any way, just make sure it's the right investment. I don't want to become like Chelsea or City, but wouldn't mind Villa/Spurs kinda money and see Arsenal as the club we should blueprint our future on.
 
This is probably the best article you'll read all summer to be honest.

Liverpool Echo.co.uk - Everton FC - News - David Prentice: Mikel Arteta articulates Everton FC fans' fears

David Prentice: Mikel Arteta articulates Everton FC fans' fears


MIKEL ARTETA usually lets his feet do the talking – and when he does Evertonians pay attention. But when Everton’s best little Spaniard opens his mouth he can be equally as eloquent, too.
You could almost hear the club interviewer choking on his questions as Arteta explained exactly what he thought about Everton’s summer transfer policy on the club’s official website.
“We have to strengthen the team and at the moment we haven’t done it,” he said.
“But we’ve signed Jo,” countered the man with the mic.
Mikel countered like Cristiano Ronaldo in a Champions League quarter-final at the Emirates. “Jo’s a big name, but it’s not like a new signing because he was here before with us,” he rapped.
The club man valiantly came back. “Yes, but David Moyes is really good at picking up bargains. You were a bargain, so was Tim Cahill and so was Joleon Lescott.”
“If he’s able to do that with good players, give him a chance with big, big names and we will see what we are able to do,” said Mikel. “He knows how to get 100% out of players, but that doesn’t mean a club like us should not have ambition to fight and try to get the top players.”
Point made.
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum doesn’t have an easy Spanish translation, but Mikel Arteta understands the concept totally.
And it’s why when Evertonians sing he’s the best little Spaniard they know, it’s not just his football they’re talking about.

Last season for Arteta here me thinks.
 

If Lescott doesn't wanna be here then I'm ok for him to go..... At the right price of course... we need players that honour the royal blue whenever they hit the pitch.
 
To be honest. If Lescott had any feelings for the club n fans, he should come out and say what his stance is....but what price loyalty. Moyes, players n fans doesn't want him to leave, it's all down to him in my opinion.
 
guardian.co.uk/football/2009/jul/27/kolo-toure-joleon-lescott-manchester-city

Manchester City close on Kolo Touré but Joleon Lescott remains elusive
• Mark Hughes close to signing £15m Arsenal centre-half
Lescott may have to agitate if he wants to join City

Manchester City are in advanced talks with Arsenal over signing Kolo Touré, although their pursuit of Joleon Lescott remains at an impasse, with Everton determined to hold on to the England international and intent on driving their valuation of the player towards the £30m mark. City, who had a £15m bid for Lescott rejected last week, have yet to return with a further offer and would prefer not to do so until the 26-year-old agitates for a move.

Whether Lescott is prepared to do that remains to be seen, with the former Wolverhampton Wanderers defender running the risk of leaving Goodison Park under a cloud if he seeks to force the issue. Everton, however, have shown no willingness to negotiate hitherto, prompting City to believe that the only way Lescott can be prised from Merseyside without paying way over the odds is through the player making it known he wishes to move on.

Should Lescott, who cost Everton £5m when he joined from Wolves three years ago, submit a transfer request, City would have some bargaining power and be confident of landing the player. In many ways the situation is similar to the one that City found themselves in when trying to entice John Terry from Chelsea. This time, however, City are more optimistic that the end result will be an England defender accepting rather than rejecting their advances.

Hughes has long admired Lescott and City are understood to have made contact with the player's representatives several months ago to inform them of their interest. Although Lescott made an indifferent start to last season, and was even dropped at one point, he quickly regained his place and finished the campaign strongly. He has often played for Everton at left-back but Hughes is keen to pair him with Touré at the heart of the City defence.

Lescott was identified as a priority signing this summer but the Terry saga meant that the club's energies were channelled elsewhere. With that door now closed, however, City hope that a deal be reached with Everton, particularly as Lescott is understood to be keen on working with Hughes and becoming another piece in what is fast becoming the Premier League's most expensive jigsaw.


Touré's move would appear more straightforward, with Arsenal expected to accept a fee in the region of £15m. Hughes picked Touré out in January and his interest in the player resurfaced following Terry's decision to commit his future to Chelsea. Should Touré agree to join, he would be City's first defensive signing in a summer when the club have spent close to £70m on their forward line.

The 28-year-old has been an integral part of the Arsenal side for the past seven years but his form suffered last season, when it also emerged that he had fallen out with William Gallas. Arsène Wenger insisted that Touré and Gallas could continue to perform together on the pitch even if they were not speaking off it, though the Arsenal manager appears to have since accepted that their partnership has run its course and that City's offer is too good to turn down.

Although Wenger has a replacement for Touré in the shape of Thomas Vermaelen, who signed from Ajax for £10m earlier this summer, the Arsenal manager would have little by way of defensive cover and could well seek to strengthen in that department over the coming weeks. He is an admirer of Brede Hangeland at Fulham but the west London club are not looking to sell and it would need a £15m bid to change that stance.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top