You're welcome
If I remember rightly, it was directed at your sparring partner @Joey66 after one of his incomprehensible rants, whilst off his head on homemade veggie crack ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're welcome
At the very worst we'll get an even bigger wedge for him now if he moves on
At the very best we've secured the services of a good keeper for many years to come
What????
1)Signing a new deal has no affect on his transfer value because he had 3 and a half years left on his current deal
2)absolute nonsense
He makes mistakes and is still learning, but his height and reach also goes against him, unless he hits the level of de gea I cant see any of the top 6 going for him.
Liverpool and chelsea needed a keeper in the summer none of them looked at pickford or schmeical. The first names on the list were oblak, allison and arizabalaga
Have you been bugging the phones at Finch Farm & wherever Leicester train?
Better than taking the real thing - Pickford being signed up will just add to his transfer value.........If I remember rightly, it was directed at your sparring partner @Joey66 after one of his incomprehensible rants, whilst off his head on homemade veggie crack ?
If I remember rightly, it was directed at your sparring partner @Joey66 after one of his incomprehensible rants, whilst off his head on homemade veggie crack ?
different scenario, pickford had a long time left.
It was a new contract to essentially give him a pay rise.
whether a person has 4 years left or 6 years left, it makes no difference on his transfer value what so ever,
bottom line, it wasnt needed yet
Not on this occasion mein frondel
https://www.grandoldteam.com/forum/threads/the-unholy-trinity.105059/#post-6569088
I think both Joey and I will be aligned on this issue; that Pickford is overrated but better than Robles
He's just not good in many obvious ways. The fact he's in the England team underlines only that England have a poor crop of GKs right now.Dave, Chelsea paid £70m for a 23-year-old from Bilbao.
Him and Pickford are pretty similar in terms of quality and Pickford is only a year older.
Add in the fact he's England's number one, in the mental Premier League market anyway - which is inflated for homegrown players - and now he's on a six-year deal, £60m would be our starting price (not that we'll sell him any time soon).
But even you said yourself that you rate Pope. Pickford starts whereas Pope can't get in ahead of him or even Butland.He's just not good in many obvious ways. The fact he's in the England team underlines only that England have a poor crop of GKs right now.
I rate him as superior to Pickford and buying him would be an efficient use of any Pickford money.But even you said yourself that you rate Pope. Pickford starts whereas Pope can't get in ahead of him or even Butland.
Yes. On his day he is a good keeper. He hasn't had many of those days this season though.He’s a good keeper, not ‘world class’ or ‘top quality’ just a good keeper.
I rate him as superior to Pickford and buying him would be an efficient use of any Pickford money.
Yes. On his day he is a good keeper. He hasn't had many of those days this season though.