Don’t see why every single action of his has to be studied in-depth. No better example of that than the ridiculous attention on Januzaj’s goal. Since then it seems that whatever he does, even the good stuff has to be chipped away at with a load of stats to prove that actually he’s not a brilliant keeper. ‘The ball was actually going wide, he was actually off his line for the pen save, his saves v Sweden were actually routine, it should have been a pen v Spain, his distribution isn’t actually as good as Ederson’s after his two long passes v spain, he actually got lucky on his pen save today.’ etc. etc. Who effin cares?! For the first time in a long time we have a keeper who actually adds to our game (and England’s) rather than undermining it. He’ll make loads of mistakes (like all keepers) but it’s a completely different situation that Howard or Robles who regularly undermined whole games with continuous mistakes. Pickford in top form wins matches and when he’s not in top form he’s still a very good keeper. Why is this not enough for some? Why are people intent on proving that if he’s not as good as De Gea or Ederson then he must actually be crap. He’s a very good keeper that we’re lucky to have.