..I seem to think somebody on here provided ITK information on this move some time ago. Good work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Major concerns on butland's fitness. Reckon he'd cost somewhere in the neighbourhood of 30 rising to 40m, and just can't justify that until he proves the ankle injury is in the past.Nearly all of us on here would prefer Butland mate. But realistically reckon he's cost double Pickford for you guys to even consider it.
I think he's the better keeper but only time will tell. I reckon 40-50mill would get the job done.Nearly all of us on here would prefer Butland mate. But realistically reckon he's cost double Pickford for you guys to even consider it.
If we can sustainably afford to splash this kind of money on players then whos arsed.
By all means get some bargains like Gueye at al, but at the end of the day if we can afford to just go, "yeah how much do you want? Sure whatever that's fine" then isn't that a positive?
I think he's the better keeper but only time will tell. I reckon 40-50mill would get the job done.
That's the big question now. I just hope it doesn't hold him back because he really has the potential to become world class.Major concerns on butland's fitness. Reckon he'd cost somewhere in the neighbourhood of 30 rising to 40m, and just can't justify that until he proves the ankle injury is in the past.
We can't wait a year for that to happen before addressing our goalkeeping situation, so pickford it is. Reckon he has a similar ceiling to Butland anyway, maybe even higher.
He owes us a year but I fully expect him to move on next year if he stays injury free.most of us agree with you on that, but no chance Butland would be available, especially after Stoke sticking by him for 18 months to get over his injurys.
England have some top top keepers at the moment, and i dont understand how Joe Hart is still no.1