Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not saying Robles is amazing and Pickford Is crap, same way I dont say Martinez was amazing and Koeman was crap... OK, Koeman was crap, but you get the point. It's the balance that I'm interested in. Being able to see the good and the bad and applying some logic to the pros and cons.
In the case of Joel and Pickford, it is particularly striking.
Pickford, for me, has had an average 1st season for us. Yes he has made some good saves. But we paid £30m for him. That is the very least I would expect for that kind of money. But the flaws in his game are inexplicably excused by some on here who talk about the undoubted qualities he has, how its plain to see how he's going to be a top player. How his young age means he's going to make mistakes and he needs time and games to grow and learn, etc, etc.
Well, Joel was the same age as Pickford when we signed him, and for a fraction of the price. He has yet, in almost 5 years being here, had 1 full season in goal, unlike Pickford, who has played week in, week out from game one (bar the odd meaningless cup/European league game) and conceding 60+ goals in the process.
Another difference between Joel and Pickford, is how each and every error Joel has made, is still held against him, and his young age, lack of experience or fragile defence in front of him has not once been used as a reason to give him some slack and give him the time to develop.
All of this, despite the fact that Joel, when called upon in each of the last 3 seasons, has came into a struggling side and seen an instant and lasting defensive improvement. -That's 3 consecutive seasons, under 2 different managers, and replacing 2 different Goalkeepers in the process. But it's just a coincidence right?
Whenever I have tried to point this out, all I get is the same response, how he was at fault for a shot he didn't save in the Derby that bobbled through a crowded defence and didn't go in anyway.
Most of the criticism Joel gets is based on 3 factors that he has no control over: the manager who signed him and his questionable record in the transfer market, the fact that the Premier league team he played for before signing for us were relegated, and the fact he looks gormless. And yes, before you ask, I am still talking about Joel.
Joel should now be coming into his peak years as a Goalkeeper, and instead, is left to sit on the bench watching Pickford get all the chances he wishes he had had. He is probably going to leave on a free in the summer, and we are going to have to spend more money on a goalkeeper to sit on the bench in his place, and to be honest, at this point in time, I don't believe there's an awful lot between him and our current 1st choice. Maybe we could've spent that £30m on a Striker and a left back, or a centre half to make Joel look better.
too small.
welded to his line.
no command of área
should I stay or should I go?
hugely overrated.
Back to what another poster said though, this season it's because the defence is poor, last season robles did well because the defence was good. Simply isn't true, it's one rule for one and another rule for the other...
Pickford been directly at fault for 2-3 goals in the previous 2-3 games or so. Burnley & Stoke.
He'll be decent one day but on the whole he's been nothing the shout about this season.
The only time I feel calm with Pickford is when he's up against a penalty.
Yeah, that's the biggest problem in this discussion. Pickford is good, maybe or maybe not deserving of the cash we paid for him. Robles stinks at any price.Joel is crap.
I just don't get the "Robles is crap" brigade. Is he De Gea or even Lloris? No. Is he basically the same level of Gomez or Mignolet? Yah.
Better question is where Pickford is.
should I stay or should I go?
I just don't get the "Robles is crap" brigade. Is he De Gea or even Lloris? No. Is he basically the same level of Gomez or Mignolet? Yah.
Better question is where Pickford is.