Again, you might have a point if we were fetching on a player who could be relied upon to "clearly contribute".
That ain't Mirallas.......he is just as liable to sulk as contribute and his head down, cutting in, always looking to shoot from improbable angles and distances when other options are available style of play is the anthisesis of how our exciting offence plays today.
As others have said, Naismith would have guaranteed us more commitment and been as big a goal threat.
Anyone who thinks Mirallas was the answer to our problems last night (which were nil in attack, BTW, just the rub of the green was lacking) doesn't know what the question was.
As ever, all IMO