Definitely wouldGetting blamed for everything recently
![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Definitely wouldGetting blamed for everything recently
![]()
Vote for her?Definitely would
It shows the industrial size stupidity of Danny Murphy when he said that the fact that the Forest playes placed his foot on the ground during the first penalty appeal meant that it wasn't a penalty (as it wasn't enough to make him fall over). If he had been one of those players who gets kicked/tripped on his right foot and then throws his left foot up to ensure he falls over (IE: he dives) then Mensa Murphy would consider that to be a penalty. It's idiots like this that make it easier for the cheats to prosper.
Yeah.Vote for her?
Yes, I'm not sure why the Luton fan would prefer us over Forest. Keeping either/or close is no odds. Forest might get points back on appeal. We might get another reduction! So surely we'd be better kept close?All three appeals could have been given but none of them were clear cut sometimes you get them sometimes you don't. They were just unlucky not to get 1 of 3 in the game.
The ref didn't give any and VAR agreed with him.
As for the VAR fella being a Luton fan so What?
Why would he favour us ? We are just as much in the mix as Forest maybe even it would have been better for Luton if we had lost bearing in mind they have a chance to do us serious damage at there ground
Forests chairman is a bit of a crackpot and maybe football isn't the game for him.
It could be on here. Usuall mix of the sensible and the cuckoo/angry. The do seem to have a lot of cuckoo angry fans tbf.Enjoyable reading:
Snatchday 1: Nottingham Forest Vs the PGMOL
This Tweet is getting a lot of talk and exposure now, so I think it's worth it's own thread... Random selection of both good and bad comments...www.forestforum.co.uk
He had 3 goes and got away with it mate.
He's a massive massive weak link on that right side cos his legs have gone. It's like a time bomb waiting to go off against better younger players - see Chelsea when 3 of the 6 came from his side when it was him and Coleman being "solid".
See how he gets on against the RS.
I was made up when Forest got promoted.
90 seconds of the game it took them to start the poverty chanting yesterday. NINETY SECONDS. Some reports of them chanting "sign on" while Beto was down unconscious.
Jumped on the "we might sue Everton" bandwagon when we got our first charge... then all their fans want "solidarity" now it's happened to them.
They can GTF. Hope they go down and stay there.
I'm taking the view that we'd be fuming if we were on the end of those decisions in a single game and I'm glad forest have called it out. But I'm also glad it's forest going to war with the league and not us. Can't see how they will benefit from what they've done, regardless of whether it leads to any change in the future.Yeah.
As for the Forest thing.....
Seen all three given, none of them where. No use crying about it.
It was however telling that all three involved Young. Sooner he's out of the picture the better. The third one deserved a goal because he was dozy.
If I was a Luton fan I'd have wanted a draw. Better to keep two clubs as close as possible and then you've got two teams who could slip up.Yes, I'm not sure why the Luton fan would prefer us over Forest. Keeping either/or close is no odds. Forest might get points back on appeal. We might get another reduction! So surely we'd be better kept close?
Loool
The sad thing is that forest think he is there to help them. He is a self serving shithouse and is only in it for himself. Throwing his professional colleagues under the bus as well.Clattenburg gets involved with refereeing again and it's a complete mess, again. Who'd have thought?
Piped the scrotes right down that didn’t it, can’t really argue with it either the scab scum.Yeah they did. To which they got a lovely response of 'oh Nottingham is full of scabs'.