NilSatis1878
Player Valuation: £750k
He's crap.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He probably is but I sincerely doubt Chelsea are looking for 20m for him at the moment. I bloody love Bony and I'd be made up if we end up with either.I don't think he will turn out to be a 1 season wonder but there is always that risk.
All things considered I think £20m on Lukaku is a much safer investment than Bony. If we bought Bony though I would be really quite happy.
I think maybe we were talking about Roms resale value really shouldn't enter into it as a factor. I think disgusting was a little strong like but you get what he means.your making a straw man arguement to which no one holds that position, I believe lukaku is better than bony and younger so can play for longer and will be worth more in the future it's a win win. I haven't heard any evertonian say "yeah we will win cups and competitions if we get bony but lukaku will be worth more in the future so i would rather take him" if someone doesn't agree with you it doesn't make it disgusting
He's crap.
your making a straw man arguement to which no one holds that position, I believe lukaku is better than bony and younger so can play for longer and will be worth more in the future it's a win win. I haven't heard any evertonian say "yeah we will win cups and competitions if we get bony but lukaku will be worth more in the future so i would rather take him" if someone doesn't agree with you it doesn't make it disgusting
I think maybe we were talking about Roms resale value really shouldn't enter into it as a factor. I think disgusting was a little strong like but you get what he means.
I'm not sure they are of a similar class just yet. But that's by the by. I get what you're saying, but do you honestly see Lukaku playing for us for 10 years?I understand the reasoning behind disliking the view of people who are looking to sell the player before he has even signed for us. But if you had the option to have two players who are of a similar class in the same position and one player can play for us for 12 years and another can play for 6. Age should be a factor when you have limited monetary funds
I didn't say it's discusting because someone disagreed i said it coz we can never just buy someone without the resale bol lox being spurted out every single time, a bit over the top of me to say it's disgusting though
I'm not sure they are of a similar class just yet. But that's by the by. I get what you're saying, but do you honestly see Lukaku playing for us for 10 years?
Twas a jokeJeez. Is this still rumbling on ffs!
Makes me wish the Board thread would spring into life.
But I like him, even with his limitations.
I think Lukaku potentially is a better player and if we buy him to develop him for ourselves and not for profit id have no qualms whatsoever about buying him. I just dont love the idea of buying a player and then offloading him when he reaches his peak, either financially or in terms of ability.SamMurpppost: 2791325 said:chances are no but it could happen and if he leaves before then, we will have more money to buy a replacement rather than having Bony and considerably less when he leaves or retires. But if I believed Bony was better than lukaku i would say take Bony but I don't, so these little variables are more of a factor wheras you believe Bony is better so they are less applicable
So you'd spend £20m on a player who has had one good season in the Premier League? Yet £20m on a 21 year old with a 1 in 2 record in the Premier League over two seasons is bad value?
Michu and Jelavic spring to mind.