Been away for a few days so just catching up on the words of wisdom expressed in this thread. Now, I don't mind
@davek's noble defence of 'the maestro', even rather enjoying his Trump-like defiance of the facts, but I'm afraid in this case he has gone a step too far.
Pardew did ok at Newcastle. But he's won nothing. He cant be placed in the same category as Martinez. It's like comparing Freddy and the Dreamers with Buffalo Springfield.
How anyone can compare five working class heroes from the north of England, like Freddie and his motley band of Dreamers, with a bunch of drug-addled, pretentious hippies riding on the coattails of Bob Dylan is beyond me - it's as preposterous as comparing Howard Kendall or Pep with Roberto Martinez!
Here's the facts: UK top 10 hits - Freddie 4 BS 0, US top 10 hits - BS1 Freddie 1, US no1 - hits BS 0 Freddie 1
Only one winner there.
And don't just take my word for it. Here's one of my favourite writers, Lester Bangs, the
@davek of rock critics:
"Freddie and the Dreamers had no masterpiece but a plentitude of talentless idiocy and enough persistence to get four albums and one film soundtrack released ... the Dreamers looked as thuggish as Freddie looked dippy ... Freddie and the Dreamers represented a triumph of rock as cretinous swill, and as such should be not only respected, but given their place in history."
Lester, as ever, says it all. Stick that up yer kaftans, Young and Stills!