Mayor's Bramley Moore Dock Open Letter To Evertonians

[Goat]

A track isn't acceptable and this needs to be fought like Kirkby was. We are a FOOTBALL team. All this other stuff is irrelevant.

We lost the Kirkby war.

 

[ijjysmith]

I think Tubes has a point tbh, as if they're going to care if we kick off

We need a new ground and we're going to keep going, especially if the new ground coincides with us getting better results on the pitch

I'm sure the club see this as a "necessary evil" to get things over the line (No pun intended)

I just can't see it happening mate. Just my opinion that's all.

 

[Goat]

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

What do they get by lying about their intentions?

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

A book voucher from Waterstones

 

[Connor]

Dan Meis will box us.

 

[Tubey]

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

Underpinning the finance for the stadium on better terms than a 'normal' guarantor I imagine. It's not a stretch to believe that this bid was a fundamental part of LCC being on board with it.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

What do they get by lying about their intentions?

Who?

The club haven't commented, they've just promoted The Mayor's defensive, open letter.

So, back to the question;

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

What is the benefit to Everton?

 

[Moomin]

I don't see that much of a problem really, this has always been on the cards since it was said Liverpool would try and host the games.

If the 2022 games are held in the UK my money would be on Birmingham.

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

We lost the Kirkby war.

Did we? I thought we didn't want to move there on the whole? Most I spoke to didn't want it

 

[Azza]

If Meis thinks he can do it then I'm sure he can.

Just wait until the design plans are shown bed wetters.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

Underpinning the finance for the stadium on better terms than a 'normal' guarantor I imagine. It's not a stretch to believe that this bid was a fundamental part of LCC being on board with it.

A guess?

Shouldn't it be transparent?

This is the council, tax payers money.

 

[Mikey_Fitzgerald]

Underpinning the finance for the stadium on better terms than a 'normal' guarantor I imagine. It's not a stretch to believe that this bid was a fundamental part of LCC being on board with it.

What he said

 

[The_La]

Who?

The club haven't commented, they've just promoted The Mayor's defensive, open letter.

So, back to the question;

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

What is the benefit to Everton?

We already know what the council have given Everton in all of this.

Really don't understand the fume.

 

[Bullet]

Now we know why those transfers were rushed ahead to give us that great day yesterday.
Deliberately choreographed to offset the negative impact of our athletics stadium announcement today.
No expert but how ever you want to spin this by crying bedwetter you know our atmosphere will have to be compromised and that means giving up points every season for potentially the next 100 years.
It could get us relegated in a season where we would have escaped by the skin of our teeth at GP.

 

[Goat]

Who?

The club haven't commented, they've just promoted The Mayor's defensive, open letter.

So, back to the question;

What do the club get from compromising/working around the challenge of athletics to accommodate Liverpool's 2022 bid?

What is the benefit to Everton?

The letter clearly states we arent compromising anything.