I agree with you in a sense. The echo aren't journalists. They're a mouthpieced used by the club though. They will help Everton out Via articles in exchange for being given "exclusives".
Do they not have £££ to pay sources inside the club?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with you in a sense. The echo aren't journalists. They're a mouthpieced used by the club though. They will help Everton out Via articles in exchange for being given "exclusives".
If someone would of told me Everton were spending £50 million on Anyone 2 years ago I would have been certified, Let alone the lad who told meLol. £24M for him.
Imagine someone told you two years ago that Everton would spend £50M on Bolassie and Schneiderlin...you'd have had them certified.
Everton's transfer policy is dreamt up by Fred the Doorman and Vera the tea lady.
Is it ok to get his name on a shirt.Believe what you want to believe mate.
Im only posting my opinion, in my opinion he will sign for us, Monday or Tuesday.
Take it or leave it, it dont matter to me no nevermind.
The pair of them I would spend no more than £20M on. We are overshooting by £30M here.If somebody told me 2 years ago we would spend 50m on Morgs I would have been over the moon.
I wouldnt have paid more than 5m for Bolasie, a player ive never ever rated, thought he was doing alright for us tho, prior to his injury.
think this would be a massive waste of money when we have so many cm already would be nice to get more attacking players as we struggle making chances gk also needed asap and a cb
Is it ok to get his name on a shirt.
The pair of them I would spend no more than £20M on. We are overshooting by £30M here.
But ok, the people they schpeak.
Lol. £24M for him.
Imagine someone told you two years ago that Everton would spend £50M on Bolassie and Schneiderlin...you'd have had them certified.
Everton's transfer policy is dreamt up by Fred the Doorman and Vera the tea lady.
As stated above United paid £23m for him only a couple of seasons ago and the inflated fees were already in the game then.
Basically we'd be giving United their cash back on a player who couldn't cut it for them.
The Chelsea bid in 2015 got up to £38M in the end. The fee inflation kicked in the next season good and proper - on that basis £47M was a snip. They mugged us because they knew we had to sell to buy. Simple as that.
£30M for Schneiderlin? Please.
Well it's a bloody good job you're not running a football club. Where was the Spurs / Chelsea game won? Center of the park, lid.think this would be a massive waste of money when we have so many cm already would be nice to get more attacking players as we struggle making chances gk also needed asap and a cb
think this would be a massive waste of money when we have so many cm already would be nice to get more attacking players as we struggle making chances gk also needed asap and a cb
The pair of them I would spend no more than £20M on. We are overshooting by £30M here.
But ok, the people they schpeak.
The pair of them I would spend no more than £20M on. We are overshooting by £30M here.
But ok, the people they schpeak.
What, they couldn't have risen each successive season from a big hike in 2014/15 to an even bigger one last season which is now being consolidated?Which is it Dave? I'm starting to think you don't actually believe what you say. Or you just make stuff up when it's convenient.
Goalkeepers save games for you,centre midfielders control the game and strikers win you games. All parts of a team contribute to a successful side, however I'd agree, I've yet to see a successful side that doesn't possess a good centre midfield.Well it's a bloody good job you're not running a football club. Where was the Spurs / Chelsea game won? Center of the park, lid.