He picked and stayed faithful to the manager.
Kirkby was obviously the only option at the time. Thankfully it didnt happen.
Kirkby was never the only option open to EFC, it was the cheap, chosen option backed and fuelled by many people still on our board today.
If it is possible to design a stadium that looks like San Mames, but can be changed into an athletics venue as well, then why not.
It's not possible to fit it into the San Mamés.
From end to end a running track need approx 177 metres.
A standard UEFA spec pitch is 105 metres.
Let's say it's 7.5 from the goal line to the first row (x2) that gives us a length of 120 metres.
To now accommodate the 57 metres still required to squeeze a track in we'll now need to gain (build a platform, Hampden style)
28.5 metres from each end which is approx 40 rows with a 700 mm depth or 35 rows with 800 mm depth.
The San Mamés lower tier is about 30 rows!
These figures are not even taking into account the gap required from the outside lane to the new row one.
Haven't worked out the width ramifications.....sorry.[/QUOTE]
And on top of all that there needs to be adequate exits which, in the case of a raised platform, may end up underneath the track rendering the whole thing pointless.
This is what I'm asking in my last post....okay, you say have faith in Meis, it wont be a bowl.....but IF a running track was to be incorporated in whatever way, is there precedent for any actual decent stadium that did have a running track previously AND is not a bowl?
Anybody any clue?
No because as
@Trueblue1878 says the track area is simply too big. The only way a square stadium can hold athletics is in a part-built configuration and finished afterwards.