Good of him to include an empty glue bottle outside the stadium as I suspect a fair few fans have a good sniff before going in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many actually have followed those plans through?
They're looking to redevelop their current stadium.
'Dalrymple says a 55,000-seater Wolves stadium on the existing site remains the priority.'
https://www.skysports.com/football/...ineux-says-managing-director-laurie-dalrymple
If they’re not starting the building until nxt year it surely gives more time to gage opinion that 52,000 isn’t good enough.
I think it will personally end up being 54/55k and the 52k was putting the feelers out.
Yeah that's what I'm thinking also,
Colin Chong said
“At this stage, it is important to stress that this is our ‘proposed’ capacity and it is what we are currently working towards. It is important to emphasise that the final capacity and design will be subject to further engagement and consultation".
So can't wait till the final announcement of our 48000 seat bowl
it happens in the housing sector mate, get PP for a bungalow, deal with the objections then resubmit the PP for a "predominantly ground floor dwelling" that is essentially a normal two floor house just the the ground floor is a touch bigger than the top floor that sailed through the PP. Thats exactly what my bro in law did.That would be soo soo backward.
Why submit a costly application for 52k.. Only to go back with another render of 57k at big cost.
Just submit the 57k render!!
Chong doing a bowl?
Could be Cincinnati FCs new stadium, too.Looks more like an American football stadium. That would be a very narrow, long pitch.
They're looking to redevelop their current stadium.
'Dalrymple says a 55,000-seater Wolves stadium on the existing site remains the priority.'
https://www.skysports.com/football/...ineux-says-managing-director-laurie-dalrymple
In a new stadium that waiting list will probably grow to over 20,000.
I think the issue is usually whether a club wants to fill a stadium with full paying fans, or try and create future fans:
Middlesborough built a stadium too big for the town and gave away tickets
West Ham have sold season tickets for about £3 a game to ensure they get people in
I'm sure Man City give away thousands of tickets
Everton seem to have taken a different view, and decided to go for a capacity that's correct without giving away tickets. Personally I think this is a mistake. There are thousands of people in Merseyside and the surrounding areas who can't get into the theme park in Anfield, priced out so that foreigners can get in and take photos of Klopp acting like a numpty on the sidelines. Everton would have had a real opportunity to get 60,000 people into the ground, but 10,000 of them probably wouldn't have been able to pay, certainly not to start with. Then again, it probably sums up modern football, more important to make sure that it has a glass tunnel club and a cheese room than getting a lot of "normal" fans in.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not blaming Moshiri, I'd probably do the same in his shoes, but I do think it would have been a chance for Everton to truly become "The People's Club".