Tom Hughes
Player Valuation: £10m
Or as is possibly more likely..... will the river come up to meet it? ?Will it sink
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or as is possibly more likely..... will the river come up to meet it? ?Will it sink
Im sure I read music events would be hosted there, stupid if they dontanyone know if there are plans to have a retractable pitch like the one in Spurs new stadium and I believe Real Madrid are currently doing one at their stadium right now.
It means that we could potentially host major sporting / music events at Bramley Moore without it affecting the pitch.
my only concern is that with the liverpool echo arena next door whether that would cause a problemIm sure I read music events would be hosted there, stupid if they dont
Dont know about a retractable pitch like, theres definitely no NFL etc like Spurs
I don't get why the roof is so high above the last row of seats, I actually think it will take away from the atmosphere
If it comes to choice ours would win hands down, just due to the capacity difference.
my only concern is that with the liverpool echo arena next door whether that would cause a problem
The evolution of our stadium discourse is pure Evertonian:
First, will it ever happen?
Then...
Will it fit?
Now...
Will it sound good?
Next???
Quick Google...
You've got permission for "four major non-sporting events at full capacity per year" at BMD.
For comparison, we've got permission for "16 non-Spurs events per year at full capacity, up to six of which can be concerts”.
That seems like a big difference but I don't think we'll reach that number anytime soon. It's a bit of long-term (perhaps wishful) thinking in case the NFL decides it wants a London franchise.
So do you think all the studies and work on creating the best atmosphere possible was all just a line to pass off a generic bowl as something it's not?Yes, the roof is very high above the stand, which is of quite a steep rake too. This of course also means that the rows of fans fall further away from that reflective surface quite quickly. Therefore only a relatively small proportion get any great acoustic effect, with the bulk of the stand essentially shouting out into open space. If that proportion is high enough, it will allow chants to propogate effectively, but it doesn't really look that way in cross sectional views. Wembley suffers similarly.
The arched roof and cranked corner sections will however have some acoustic enhancing effects but not sure how much. The large end stand at Spurs has some similar deficiencies, but is deeper and bigger capacity. The South Tribune at Dortmund should've probably been the ideal benchmark. This has a slightly downward pointing roof with a small apex towards the rear, which pools much of the noise and allows chants to spread across the whole stand, encouraging the whole end to join in and project it out onto the pitch. I think the design proposed for WHP actually was better in this respect.... with a larger home end and better roof angle.
The initial BMD stadium was east-west and also had a bigger home end. The current BMD home end is 60 rows I think.... which is only approx 2 rows more than the Gwladys upper and lower combined. Of course it will have greater unity as a single tier, but it's not the mega-home end originally promised.
Any idea what you make on an NFL match? As in, the fee, not the match day income which would be similar to a normal home game I would guess.
So do you think all the studies and work on creating the best atmosphere possible was all just a line to pass off a generic bowl as something it's not?
I've had my suspicions as more and more was revealed.
I somehow think I'll be pleasantly surprised and underwhelmed at the same time. Which somehow perfectly encapsulates Everton more than any unique design ever could.
Thanks Tom, interesting as always.Yes, the roof is very high above the stand, which is of quite a steep rake too. This of course also means that the rows of fans fall further away from that reflective surface quite quickly. Therefore only a relatively small proportion get any great acoustic effect, with the bulk of the stand essentially shouting out into open space. If that proportion is high enough, it will allow chants to propogate effectively, but it doesn't really look that way in cross sectional views. Wembley suffers similarly.
The arched roof and cranked corner sections will however have some acoustic enhancing effects but not sure how much. The large end stand at Spurs has some similar deficiencies, but is deeper and bigger capacity. The South Tribune at Dortmund should've probably been the ideal benchmark. This has a slightly downward pointing roof with a small apex towards the rear, which pools much of the noise and allows chants to spread across the whole stand, encouraging the whole end to join in and project it out onto the pitch. I think the design proposed for WHP actually was better in this respect.... with a larger home end and better roof angle.
The initial BMD stadium was east-west and also had a bigger home end. The current BMD home end is 60 rows I think.... which is only approx 2 rows more than the Gwladys upper and lower combined. Of course it will have greater unity as a single tier, but it's not the mega-home end originally promised.
I personally think there's been a compromise somewhere. Eg, in order to improve natural light(that's a guess not a fact) they've sacrificed a closer roof distance, you can't do everything in a design sometimes it's one or the other.So do you think all the studies and work on creating the best atmosphere possible was all just a line to pass off a generic bowl as something it's not?
I've had my suspicions as more and more was revealed.
I somehow think I'll be pleasantly surprised and underwhelmed at the same time. Which somehow perfectly encapsulates Everton more than any unique design ever could.
Yes.Any pics of the steel being manufactured yet?