Back on the Montana-Brady question (I'm sure old timers will toss in Unitas, to make it more interesting. @mezzrow?), it's hard to compare the two completely separate eras. Brady gets much praise for 6 Super Bowl appearances in his time (still going, could add another?) during an era of parity, uncertainty, and generally weaker teams. No doubt this is the stuff of one of the best ever. Montana only made 4 appearances (probably a stretch to suggest he could have won in 1995, as I stated earlier), winning each, but his fights were in the NFC, not the Super Bowl. His era was one of dominant, pre-salary cap, smash-mouth teams.
Leave aside the remarkable 1985 Bears and the 1984 Raiders (with their 2nd win in 4 years) victories, and you get absolute dominance from 1982 to 1996, a 15 year run. During this time you saw San Francisco win 5 times in 5 appearances. Dallas won 3 times in 3 appearances. The Giants won 2 Super Bowls under Bill Parcels, and Gibbs' Redskins won 3 and lost 1. Without discounting Brady's brilliance, let's not brush aside what Montana did, because each time he won a Super Bowl, he also defeated these other NFC teams, which were his main competition.
Leave aside the remarkable 1985 Bears and the 1984 Raiders (with their 2nd win in 4 years) victories, and you get absolute dominance from 1982 to 1996, a 15 year run. During this time you saw San Francisco win 5 times in 5 appearances. Dallas won 3 times in 3 appearances. The Giants won 2 Super Bowls under Bill Parcels, and Gibbs' Redskins won 3 and lost 1. Without discounting Brady's brilliance, let's not brush aside what Montana did, because each time he won a Super Bowl, he also defeated these other NFC teams, which were his main competition.
Last edited: