Next time i'll do all your research for you, and put it all in an easy-to-read table. Sorry for not spoon-feeding you enough this time, my bad.
Easy mistake for you to make, given your apparent proclivity for ignoring what is stated. And the obvious logical flaw in your argument is that the "top" teams don't amass such a regular collection of poor draws and losses against teams in the lower part of the table - that's exactly why they are top teams, and we are not.
So you've spent two or three posts now accusing me of lacking balance in my assessment of Martinez's string of poor results, only to now acknowledge my discussion is balanced?