BernieWright13
Player Valuation: £15m
We've passed the 70% mark
Scratches head and wonders where some people have been since December 2014
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We've passed the 70% mark
I'm sorry but you've said that they weren't criticised and yet it was clear to them they were. Not sure I can work around thatWhere have they (the Echo) been criticised? They are rightly defending their article as it implies that their interpretation is in fact wrong or false.
All I've heard and read was an emphasis on Baines and his responsibility. "Leighton Baines knows he has to take responsibility for those words..."
"...and obviously for that he has apologised and taken responsibility for that for leaving those words open..."
"... we expect him to take responsibility, to make sure that we speak on the pitch and the way to do that is against Watford."
Again, if it was the Echo and other members of the press who've made the interpretation then the emphasis should have been on them.
Instead, the focus was on Leighton and his actions as I could see very little evidence that Martinez was instead aiming it at the press.
Baines may not want to put himself in the firing line, but if I were Leighton I don't think I'd be too pleased with Martinez's comments.
Therefore, if it were the press who were to blame then surely he'd want to clarify that.
Are albondigas what I think they are ?
Agree with this. This poll isn't a true reflection of the general mood towards Martinez at the moment.The poll needs to be reset surely? You're relying on people who voted Months ago to come back and change their vote? I'd say if the poll was restarted it'd be 90%+ now. Easily
They were not openly criticised in the article at any point, nor did Martinez openly refere to the fact it was they who were at fault.I'm sorry but you've said that they weren't criticised and yet it was clear to them they were. Not sure I can work around that
No, I would rather he have saidWould you guys rather he said "we're playing rubbish, we have no chemistry, no self belief, don't know how to defend and nobody wants to take ownership. I'm going to forfeit the semi final because of this".
If you don't like it, don't read it, why get worked up over it and post insults.
Certainly don't want to forfeit the semi.Would you guys rather he said "we're playing rubbish, we have no chemistry, no self belief, don't know how to defend and nobody wants to take ownership. I'm going to forfeit the semi final because of this".
If you don't like it, don't read it, why get worked up over it and post insults.
They were not openly criticised in the article at any point, nor did Martinez openly refere to the fact it was they who were at fault.
I've quoted the article highlighting where he refers to responsibility of Baines. Can you quote where Martinez states the press are responsible?
But as a consequence of saying Baines left them open to misinterpretation, then therefore their eventual written interpretation will be wrong.
It's called cause and effect... Baines makes a mistake and press write about it. Baines doesn't say it in that way and they wouldn't write in error.
They are replying as they are defending the position that Baines is not at fault and hence their article is in fact a fair representation.
He's saying Baines has accepted the responsibilities he has as a player.They were not openly criticised in the article at any point, nor did Martinez openly refere to the fact it was they who were at fault.
I've quoted the article highlighting where he refers to responsibility of Baines. Can you quote where Martinez states the press are responsible?
But as a consequence of saying Baines left them open to misinterpretation, then therefore their eventual written interpretation will be wrong.
It's called cause and effect... Baines makes a mistake and press write about it. Baines doesn't say it in that way and they wouldn't write in error.
They are replying as they are defending the position that Baines is not at fault and hence their article is in fact a fair representation.
He said in his press conference that "the hype surrounding our semi-final win has affected our league form", that is a good excuse for getting beaten after the semi-final. What has he got to say about our form prior to the cup semi.
He seems just to be saying words.
The headlines and by lines did misquote himMartinez claimed baines was misquoted and thus blaming the media.
They have published the full quotes to defend against this lie and show they quoted him exactly.
The headlines and by lines did misquote him