Oh, I see, you're basing your whole critique on what Martinez has done to date are you?
Well spotted mate. I said it in plain English. Have a peanut.
Right, then you'll have in that body of evidence the fact he has run up our best PL record; that we are playing by almost everyone's reckoning our best football since the 80s; and that he has assembled a very very good group of players and is developing them as we speak.
Three seasons ago he ran up our best PL record. And all credit to him for that. He made incisive substitutions on a regular basis, showed no favouritism in his team selections and made very good use of the players available to him. He also made three brilliant moves in the loans market. He has generally since then done fairly well in the transfer market and strengthened the squad, but let's not pretend he's got EVERY move right: McGeady? Alcaraz? Kone? All poor moves. At least they haven't been big-money poor moves, but Alcaraz cost us several points last year all by himself.
When we play well under Martinez, we play very well indeed. Many instances spring to mind from last season, particularly in the two games against Wolfsburg. When everything clicks it is definitely the best football we've played since the mid-80s... but it doesn't click all that often. Too often in fact it goes badly wrong and the manager stubbornly refuses to make changes. It also somewhat misleading to refer to it as the best football we've played since the 80s, because the football we played in the 90's and early 00's was absolutely dire, for the most part.
We are what we are: one week a top 8 team which would have earned the dullard Moyes plaudits; next week we drop a couple of places. We are a midtable team developing our talents and looking to do well in the cuos.
We aren't a top eight team unless we regularly finish in the top eight. Your position in February does not automatically determine your position at the end of the season. The issue is the trend over time - under Martinez we started very well (looking and playing like a top six team throughout his first season, getting results in keeping with that and thus finishing in the top six) but have steadily got worse since then, evidenced by regular poor results against traditionally bottom-half teams and newly promoted teams, culminating in final league positions at a lower level. We've spent most of this season in the bottom half of the table, despite scoring more than almost every other club in the prem - some draw parallels between this scenario and the fate that befell Wigan not so long ago.... and they have a point.
How in all that you come to your doomsday scenarios I have no idea. It must be a very lonely and dark place to live where you are to draw your conclusions.
What doomsday scenario is that? I have made no such statement, Captain Agenda. I've simply observed that the evidence from Roberto's tenure to date raises questions about his ability to get us competing for a CL spot - you, know, because we have most recently finished FURTHER away from those spots than we did before. It's a results-driven league Dave: you don't get moved up the table for playing "your best football since the 80s", you move up the table by WINNING. And we don't do enough WINNING.
Bottom line: the manager is doing ok, his team continues to develop; there's another three seasons on RMs contract that he WILL see out barring a sheik takeover.
That's YOUR bottom line. Here on planet Earth Martinez is not doing OK. Although he has got it right on several individual occasions, he seems unable to string a run of decent results together and appears particularly susceptible to tactical errors and stubbornness. The team is developing, but not as quickly as it should because of his favouritism being shown in his selection and substitution decisions.
The only thing you are right about is that this board won't sack him.