We were playing Arsenal not Accrington Stanley. They had one shot left to keep alive their season, so let's not forget the other side of the equation here. Yes, the performance was insipid and that goes down to Martinez as well as the players. But that match was atypical of the way we have played for the most part this season. It's no use using that particular 90 minutes to suggest a general malaise which isn't there. Personally, I felt the occasion had an 'after the lord Mayor's parade' build up to it and we were flat as an organisation going into it. Unsupportable as that is from professionals.
You say he's not got the skill set to get the best from the group of players. That doesn't quite scan, imo. He can get it from them but not with consistency. But they are his players and he can get them playing, as anyone with two brain cells to rub together can see this season. My view is that he'll get that consistency, but he'll also need to sort out some personnel changes in defence. A new GK, yes. But also we need to revert to a much flatter back four which could see both FBs shifted out the club or from their starting positions at least.
Bottom line for me: it continues to be a huge stretch to believe that what Martinez has done is worthy of dismiaal. Anyone advocating it has an ahistorical view of the club and how we've previously operated (a temperate tradition worth maintaining), and they have a shaky grasp of what's required to move us on.