If Everton is Brian Laws then quite possibly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
- Status
I'm just glad they hate us all equally...socialism has its benefits.
It wasn't necessarily a bad substitution (probably was though). However, you, I and everyone else knew that if West Ham scored one then the panic button would be pressed. It even reared its ugly head when Villa got one back midweek. It's alarming.
We were 2 up with 10 men. It was easy to say during the event. He could have pushed Oviedo up and thrown on Barnes. He ballsed up the substitution and it was clear as day when he was doing it!
For the reasons I just pointed out above it wasn't as clear as day mate. There was solid logic behind it.
It pains me to my core mate, despite my best attempts to brush it off.
Zatara
Player Valuation: £100m
I 'liked' this post even though im not quite sure what it means!!
Anyway,Moshiri now onboard...onwards and upwards!
royvernon39
Player Valuation: £10m
I am not convinced by the tired argument justifying nutty substitutions.
The squad had just come back from Dubai where they were supposed to have worked on fitness. They had
also had a relatively easy away mid week game. When Lennon came off, the team was coping well defensively and were really dangerous on the break. Lennon especially was playing well, industrious and showing no signs of tiredness and the team structure was denying WHU.
Why change it? And why not make like for like subs? Niasse coming on changed everything. He is new, maybe not match fit, and did not work hard as Lennon had done. It was like watching the WBA game again - bring off your best player and put on a fish out of water. I bet all four defenders had an inward moan when seeing Lennon go off and a new, untested centre-forward come on. That was the real psychological damage.
Finally, I don't know if it has been mentioned but why was Stones playing in midfield with Besic and Barry on the bench?
I used to get headaches trying to understand why DM selected Neville, then why RM selected Howard and now RM's game planning and substitutions.
The squad had just come back from Dubai where they were supposed to have worked on fitness. They had
also had a relatively easy away mid week game. When Lennon came off, the team was coping well defensively and were really dangerous on the break. Lennon especially was playing well, industrious and showing no signs of tiredness and the team structure was denying WHU.
Why change it? And why not make like for like subs? Niasse coming on changed everything. He is new, maybe not match fit, and did not work hard as Lennon had done. It was like watching the WBA game again - bring off your best player and put on a fish out of water. I bet all four defenders had an inward moan when seeing Lennon go off and a new, untested centre-forward come on. That was the real psychological damage.
Finally, I don't know if it has been mentioned but why was Stones playing in midfield with Besic and Barry on the bench?
I used to get headaches trying to understand why DM selected Neville, then why RM selected Howard and now RM's game planning and substitutions.
A lot of assertions there mate.
Stones was playing as part of a back five not in midfield too. Maybe tired perceptions as much as tired arguments.
Toast
Player Valuation: £80m
Your auto correct is a Kopite mate.
People over reacting saying worse sub ive ever seen etc.. Clearly weren't there at the Emirates when 1-0 down n Moyes took off Saha for Distin!
Your acting like Martinez brought on Del for Mori n went play Centre back..
The blames lies on whoever you dislike most, clearly you all hate Martinez
Your acting like Martinez brought on Del for Mori n went play Centre back..
The blames lies on whoever you dislike most, clearly you all hate Martinez
Great logic there mate.
Basically you can defend it all you want, but it was a horrible sub and you can screw hindsight cos I said the same thing as soon as it was made.
Toast
Player Valuation: £80m
The worst sub I've seen was Besic coming on for us against Chelsea, when he made that daft back heel pass.
A total no win situation for Besic that, we were beaten by then and the lad comes on for some game time.
Good job he's a very strong character.
You're inept when it comes to any rational view of football so anything you disagree with basically endorses it.
- Status