To be honest a lot of the most common points people have made do nothing to make me feel better about Martinez. It's mostly speculation. Some of it educated and some just "wish it was true" stuff: like the "fact" he's a great big game/Cup manager.
However what DOES make me feel better is his dedication to the game. He seems fairly progressive in that regard. Super engaged. He'll represent the club well. Physio background and focus on fitness seems encouraging. He seems smart and hard-working ... it's hard to screw up too badly with that combo.
This may be a fairly difficult concept to explain but I wasn't keen on a manager who was just relegated because I wish we were attracting "bigger" names BUT I don't particularly care he got relegated. The fact he was relegated with a team spending pretty much the least of any team in the league is fairly irrelevant in predicting how he'll do here.
He didn't drastically under-perform in relegating Wigan; he just failed to ever over-perform to any significant degree (aside from the Cup run of course). If another team had hired him and a mate of mine who was a fan was worried about them being relegated I'd tell him that it's not really a big deal given Wigan's stature.
But that doesn't mean I don't wish we had a chairman who wasn't afraid to reach a little and sell the club to someone whom the general public wouldn't think would take this job. The fact a relegated manager is our only serious option is depressing; but the fact he got relegated doesn't matter in judging him. I guess it's a case of judging BK's job in the manager search v. judging Martinez. That might not make sense to anyone else.
Don't see the point in being negative about it tbh mate, as it now looks like he's 99% likely to be our new manager. All i know is we're more likely to win those one off games which are the difference between winning a trophy and not winning one for nearly 20 years.
The four early round exits to lower league opposition he apparently suffered in the prior years* not a concern? They aren't to me actually but if I'm paying attention to the Cup he won then shouldn't I pay attention to the Cups he crapped out of early too?
* I haven't looked this up but somebody mentioned it in the other thread. If it's wrong then sorry ... no time to look it up now.
Anyway I couldn't give a crap about the half lottery that is Cups as far as its usefulness in predicting future events. I'd love to win one, don't get me wrong. For the fans and club it's fantastic. However as a useful tool for predicting future events? It's pretty useless. The Cups won by Birmingham, Middlesbrough, Blackburn and Leicester did not signal great things ahead. Hell we won a Cup and went on the worst run I have ever witnessed in my time as an Everton fan ... we were utterly horrible for six years afterwards and very lucky not to get relegated.
Doesn't mean that he's NOT going to be better at winning those games either of course. But doesn't mean he IS either (as much as people WANT it to be true given the fact we've gone almost 20 years without a Cup which is an outrage assuming you ignore the fact we usually only win a domestic Cup once every 25 years or so).