With 2 years left Lukaku should only be allowed to leave once we have a suitable replacement in.
That is what any club moving in the right direction would do.
His requirements are meaningless imo compared to those of Everton.
With 2 years left Lukaku should only be allowed to leave once we have a suitable replacement in.
That is what any club moving in the right direction would do.
His requirements are meaningless imo compared to those of Everton.
not really, he scores plenty when we are already in front, just means we will have to be tighter at the back. Whoever replaces him will be a scorer too, and we currently have 17 others who can find the net. Would be mega if he stays but we'll be sound if he goes. History agrees (lineker).We are so goosed once he leaves.
Can be 'pants' every game if he keeps on scoringAce goal, but I thought he was pants today with his alround play.
Still, cant moan about the number of goals.
Maybe we need to credit the defenders more, if Rom has off games.
His finish looked sublime from my angle and all credit for it, although for large swathes of the game he was relatively quiet and ineffective.Ace goal, but I thought he was pants today with his alround play.
Ace goal, but I thought he was pants today with his alround play.
Still, cant moan about the number of goals.
Maybe we need to credit the defenders more, if Rom has off games.
Ace goal, but I thought he was pants today with his alround play.
Still, cant moan about the number of goals.
Maybe we need to credit the defenders more, if Rom has off games.
Exactly. And When we have Koeman in charge that WILL be the case .With 2 years left Lukaku should only be allowed to leave once we have a suitable replacement in.
That is what any club moving in the right direction would do.
His requirements are meaningless imo compared to those of Everton.
That's called lying mateyAll we have to do for the lad is guarantee we'll finish top 4 next season and probably win the league and he'll defo sign up for more Everton adventures. Why don't we just do that?