Probably because having him here hasn't really led to anything other than him padding out his goal record.
If you'd have asked me three years ago what I thought the impact of a near-£30m addition to the Everton side would be, I imagine I'd have expected something along the lines of Tevez at City, Bale at Spurs or Suarez/Torres at Liverpool.
As it's turned out, having him hasn't been the difference in big games, or even inspired a marginal improvement in league position. In fact, Everton are now firmly entrenched in the bottom half, and still get turfed out of cup competitions at the first sign of a decent side.
Also, as someone who has made some frankly outrageous claims regarding the quality of the current Everton team, I'm sure you won't reply to this by claiming that his fine goal return has been the only thing keeping them in the division.
I hope you will now reconsider sneering at anyone who isn't too cut up about saying goodbye to this unlikeable diva.
Right, but he's scored 18 goals this PL campaign. It's not his job to defend the leads those goals have given us... I've said many times that I think he's far from the complete package, but he's the best we'll get for where we are as a club.
And what outrageous claims are those mate?
I really don't see why you make a battle out of everything? I don't think many people view Lukaku as a diva...
It's simply that he's a footballer focusing on improving himself. Had other areas of the team been sorted out (in hindsight, and I've admitted I was wrong on this, RM is hugely at fault) then his goals could (and probably would) have seen us entrenched firmly in the top half. In fact, look at the goalscorers around Lukaku. Their teams all finished in the top four...