He's a 22 year old player for gods sake, he's not prefect but then again no player is at 22. He needs to work on certain aspect of his play to become more rounded of course but in the meantime he's already an outstanding player who can win games almost single handedly.
I think it's worth considering for a minute where the likes of Costa, Lewandowski, Mandzukic or even Drogba where at at this stage of their careers. None of them were in a top competitive league, and none of them had a scoring ratio to touch Lukaku's.
Lukaku's biggest failing is he's not got any real competition at Everton at the minute, there's times he clearly needs a rest but we're unable to offer him that and because he's still so dangerous it's unwise to drop him. His touch is fine, it's just that it's inconsistent and the reason for this is down to a lack of concentration rather than skill, which takes us right back to his age...
Oh. So we can look around and find loads of 22 year olds/players with 200 first team games who have a first touch so bad they have actually set up opposition strikers for goals?
You can do what you want I suppose. But while you're looking find another 22 year old with a matching goalscoring record in top flight football will you please.
Can't mate cause there isn't one.
But if his control is so bad because of his age you'll easily be able to find other players of his age and younger with equally as bad first touches, and strikers of his age and younger with such poor hold up play at times.
And any player of any age who has played over 200 first team games for 3 differing PL teams and played in a world cup who is still so poor at certain basics of the game.
Put him on ignore and save yourself the troubleI cant keep up with all these threads @Dithering Dougie is cracking heads in.
Put him on ignore and save yourself the trouble
Interesting that Tony Cottee has a better Premier League strike rate. Especially when considering that people are banging on about his goal ratio and that nothing else matters.
He's a 22 year old player for gods sake, he's not prefect but then again no player is at 22. He needs to work on certain aspect of his play to become more rounded of course but in the meantime he's already an outstanding player who can win games almost single handedly.
I think it's worth considering for a minute where the likes of Costa, Lewandowski, Mandzukic or even Drogba where at at this stage of their careers. None of them were in a top competitive league, and none of them had a scoring ratio to touch Lukaku's.
Lukaku's biggest failing is he's not got any real competition at Everton at the minute, there's times he clearly needs a rest but we're unable to offer him that and because he's still so dangerous it's unwise to drop him. His touch is fine, it's just that it's inconsistent and the reason for this is down to a lack of concentration rather than skill, which takes us right back to his age...
Not true. If he plays well, I say he has played well, and have done regularly. It just doesn't stand out to you when I do because you're looking to be annoyed by the negative, so you filter for that - case in point, you ignored me praising his impact in the WBA thread.
I'm not going to lie just to "cheer on the lads". If he's crap, I'll say he's crap. He was crap against West Brom, did nothing, then exploded to life, won the game, and that was that. Even in this thread, I've said he's a fantastic goalscorer. I'm not just rabidly tearing apart the guy for no reason.
It's hypocritical of you to have a go at me for pointing out when he's poor, but you won't bat an eyelid at people constantly ignoring how bad he can be on here.
It's a discussion forum - I talk about what I see.