Ronald Koeman discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ran a bath for the missus already had a few and will have a few more beers mate, will that make today's performance any less embarrassing though, methinks not.

The day I'm not arsed about getting g absolutely rimmed at goodison by a spurs side that really isn't that good is the day I quit.

You think Spurs aren't that good? Mate, c'mon.
 

..I've always been of a view that a new manager needs time to bring his players in and move others out. To this end, the transformation has been quite amazing, particularly given how difficult it is to get deadwood out. Because of this, I have generally not given an opinion on players he's wanted. It's important that a manager is left to get on with it and build his team.

We are now in that stage, albeit early in that stage. This is now Ronald Koeman's team and he can justifiably be held to account. Saying that, a team doesn't gel immediately and he will need time to tinker and change. I want to see signs of the direction of travel, I want to see signs of the strategy. There were a few glimpses of decent footballers against Hadjuk Split but no consistent evidence at this point.

Only Koeman asked for a leading striker and a center-back and the owner failed to deliver and instead throwing the top 6 ball back to the manager.
 
Only Koeman asked for a leading striker and a center-back and the owner failed to deliver and instead throwing the top 6 ball back to the manager.

What I keep coming back to is the delivery of 5/6/7 players dead early, the window long pursuit of Gylfi, (Koemans #1 target by all accounts, for a lot of £££), but this weird non delivery of a striker/CB/cover.

Odd.
 
Only Koeman asked for a leading striker and a center-back and the owner failed to deliver and instead throwing the top 6 ball back to the manager.

...I'm not sure that was exactly the case.

RK said in interview this week that he thought he had target no1 and target no2 but they didn't materialise (I suspect no1 was Giroud). No fault of the owner. He then said they worked down the list and players were either not available or the selling clubs were asking more than their worth. They got so far down the list to a point where it was better to walk away.
 

What I keep coming back to is the delivery of 5/6/7 players dead early, the window long pursuit of Gylfi, (Koemans #1 target by all accounts, for a lot of £££), but this weird non delivery of a striker/CB/cover.

Odd.

Maybe just maybe that depended on Barkley and Niasse. At the end of the day we are still sell to buy. This comes to the question why didn't we use the ICBC loan? Or the loan is only for the stadium?
 
Maybe just maybe that depended on Barkley and Niasse. At the end of the day we are still sell to buy. This comes to the question why didn't we use the ICBC loan? Or the loan is only for the stadium?

The activity near the end of the window, (I was asleep, so going on what this place said), was that it looked like the Chelsea cash for Ross was needed for a striker. Maybe that overdraft was used for Gylfi? Its deffo not anything to do with the ground.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top