Ronald Koeman discussion

[Saint Domingo]

Come on lads you've had your dummy out of the pram fume over a warm Carling. Seriously calling for Koeman after two defeats in 8, on the back of a season where he lifted us 4 places and created an exciting team is utterly ridiculous. Simple as that so don't you dare @ me. If you can't see it then you're part of the problem as any underwhelming Manager. He deserves a lot more time to try and make this work.

You team cult bro?

 

[d4kyxx]

He's still not getting sacked lads. Cryarse as much as you want but it's not going to happen.

Even if we got relegated I'd doubt we'd sack him

I know the board all to well to know they would be in tears regarding the compensation they'd have to pay.

 

[chicoazul]

You team cult bro?

I'm just trying to create a polarising wedge now bro. Once the two sides are snarling at each other then I'm rar back to ze fence.

 

[chicoazul]

Even if we got relegated I'd doubt we'd sack him

I know the board all to well to know they would be in tears regarding the compensation they'd have to pay.

Didn't they pay Martinez out an absolute severance wedge?

 

[d4kyxx]

Didn't they pay Martinez out an absolute severance wedge?

Yes but it took two failed seasons for them to finally do it. I think Koemans on more money also so it would hurt even more.

 

[USABlue]

I don't think he should be sacked as there is some merit to having get all the new players settled in but I'm very worried and frustrated by the lack of direction (can't even see how he's trying to get us to play tactically. and by the fact half the team doesn't look arsed

 

[Gwladysstreetlad]

Even if we got relegated I'd doubt we'd sack him

I know the board all to well to know they would be in tears regarding the compensation they'd have to pay.

I'd not go that far mate! They did sack El Fraudo after all even with all the compensation that we had to pay out there. I don't buy we'll be anywere near a relegation dogfight this season. We might be stuck with a Koeman season with awful spells followed by a good run, which isn't good enough but it will never get that bad. Anything less then a top half finish is bad enough to justify sacking.

 

[Khalekan]

Stoke you say? The same Stoke who we beat in a good result that lots on here sniffed at and dismissed?

Yes, the very same Stoke.

And with almost as many new players "bedding in. as us.

 

[chicoazul]

Yes but it took two failed seasons for them to finally do it. I think Koemans on more money also so it would hurt even more.

Moshiri made that call and had only been in charge 3 months before he made it mate.

 

[Zezti]

If sack him does that somehow lead to us improving our striker situation? Maybe some will come out the woodwork once mr Koemean with his harsh words has gone.

 

[Timak]

If sack him does that somehow lead to us improving our striker situation? Maybe some will come out the woodwork once mr Koemean with his harsh words has gone.

I don't think the only problem is the lack of striker.

The midfielders he has bought seem completely incompatible with each other. 3 play basically in the same position and require playmaking midfielders and wingers - of which we don't seem to have any.

 

[riddick]

Yes but it took two failed seasons for them to finally do it. I think Koemans on more money also so it would hurt even more.

Yeah but Martinez still had like 4 years left on his deal, Koeman'd is up end of next season

 

[summerisle]

Ronald Booman

Ronald Pooman.

 

[chicoazul]

Do you want us to be like Palace? Then stand up and stop the knee jerk melts shouting you all down. It's ludicrous to want Koeman sacking now.

 

[Jeff Jones]

I don't think we'd have won on Saturday even if Lukaku had played. He scores goals, but I don't think he would've been the difference between losing 0-3 and winning.
Or any of the strikers we might have replaced him with.