Celtic though! C'mon, that's lower half of the Championship class.
Celtic scored after about 3 minutes and had City all over the shop, they couldn't get on the ball like they usually do and Celtic just ran into the ground chasing them.
Celtic though! C'mon, that's lower half of the Championship class.
No I'm happy as anything, went to city, setup perfectly, got a point.
Don't let the facts get in the way fella
Yes, we'd have been '3-0 down'.
We played City four times last season: lost the first, won the second, drew the third and lost the fourth.
We drew 0-0 in this fixture last season and we at least made a game of it.
Hiding behind the couch because it's City isn't impressive, it's shameful.
I'd rather have had their fearless 3-3 than our fearful 1-1.Celtic scored after about 3 minutes and had City all over the shop, they couldn't get on the ball like they usually do and Celtic just ran into the ground chasing them.
Much has been said of this upgrade, but City are only one point ahead where they were this time last season when everyone was raving on them as odds on to win the title. The truth is that Guardiola has done well since coming in by keeping the plate spinning...they haven't lost momentum.
I heard Koeman post match yesterday and his words about this City team being 'the best he's ever faced' sounded like a convenient fig leaf to hide an overtly rearguard exercise on his behalf.
That City team wont demolish many PL teams if they all sit with 10 behind the ball like we did.City started well last season mate but very quickly lost their magic with all the Pep stories coming out. Without looking it up, I don't think we played them while they were in their early form?
This season's a completely different story though IMO, Celtic played the game of their lives and got a draw at their place. Spurs won at WHL but they're miles ahead of us in terms of investment as well as Poch being in his 4th season (one of the reasons I lost faith in Martinez was seeing how brilliantly Poch did in the same timeframe).
City looked amazing yesterday and are so stacked with quality, it was never going to be an easy one. I liked that Martinez went at teams but there were many more examples where it was embarrassing how we were set up (that game when the RS had like 40 shots was the worst thing I've experienced as an Evertonian).
If anything I'm relieved that we have the fixture out the way and have a point from it, as they look like they'll demolish sides given the chance.
I was far from convinced with Koeman before he was appointed but he's definitely doing things the right way IMO. I'm hoping that we can attract the players that we dreamed of in the summer, and then we'd be able to compete more - as it stands though we have to play for points.
I'd rather have had their fearless 3-3 than our fearful 1-1.
Exactly.It was knife to a gun fight dressed up. There's no way to get round this. It's not even the 'idealist v realist' debate that raged between Martinez and Moyes, it's setting up with no intention to win a game because you believe that the opposition are too good to compete against. This is ultimately what Koeman did yesterday, what Moyes did at times, and what Martinez did in certain games. Whether the manager openly says it or not it is all the same knife to a gunfight approach and I find it extremely disappointing when it does occur.
I'll tell you a good fact about football, if you attack you score goals, that gives you a chance of winning, having absolutely no intention of attacking means you get a point at most.
I'm not into watching us get pummelled for 90 in the hope of snatching a draw. That's not football and everyone on here slates the hell out of Pulis for playing that way.