But it also didn't work in games and while Uruguay and Italy, I agree, aren't the odds on favourite, unbeatable juggernauts they were made out to be when the draw was made, they are still top teams you can't afford to lose the ball cheaply against.
For Barkley to play, as far as I'm concerned, he needs to be in the central position behind the striker, which means displacing Rooney. It's a big risk and one Hodgson would be crucified for if it didn't work (regardless of how average Rooney's form is at the moment). He'd have to be 100% it was the right thing to do, and while Barkley's good and shows flashes of brilliance (which are getting more regular), he does have stinkers, he does have bad games too, too many arguably at the moment, to justify the risk.
I don't see why. A sitting midfield pairing of Gerrard and Henderson with three more attack minded players in front would allow both Rooney and Barkley to play.
I'm sure somebody said Barkley's pass completion was 96% against Ecuador, hardly the sign of somebody who gives the ball away loads.