Ross Barkley

[d4kyxx]

Whats reasonable in this window ? We sell Ross for 30million when Kyle Walker costs 45million and we've been quoted same for Gylfi and someone like Nathan Aki costs 20million based on a handful of decent PL games. Honestly dont know the answer to that as there is no actual reasonable benchmark as it stands right now - games gone bonkers !

Your right pal it has. I'm upset we sold rom for 75 when Walker cost 50. Yes we can get upto 90 but there's no guarantee he will hit the transfer clauses to reach that.

With one year left on his deal I think 30m in this day is decent. If he had four years left you could argue 50 was reasonable

 

[COYBL25]

Bruceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee !

 

[Jayhow15]

Your right pal it has. I'm upset we sold rom for 75 when Walker cost 50. Yes we can get upto 90 but there's no guarantee he will hit the transfer clauses to reach that.

With one year left on his deal I think 30m in this day is decent. If he had four years left you could argue 50 was reasonable

I reckon that a deal will be done in the region of 30million. Think thats fair too. In my opinion, for what its worth he's not lived up to his potential and is no longer a "kid" in footballing terms. Leg break aside he's been in and around first team football since 2011 now. Mate of mine couldnt believe his (Barkley) age when we were talking about him the other day, i think its a misconception that people seem to associate Ross with being a young player making his way up.

 

[applecrumble]

I'd rather Ross stay than sign Sigurdsson or any other player we have been linked too as possible replacements. I think if he stays he can have a great season.

 

[everton2004]

Is that worth 50 million ? And probably a better wage than we are offering Ross?

£50M minus what we get for Ross to improve the position? Good business I'd say.

 

[Gwladysstreetlad]

It's simple. If Spurs don't match our valuation Ross should go nowhere (a little less is acceptable to get the deal but otherwise better to leave it). I'd rather we were spiteful and lost money to deny Spurs their man and destroy Barkleys chances at the world cup. Harsh maybe but I only care about Everton and I'm happy for us to be perceived as the bad guys by some if that means clubs and players alike know they can't take the mick out of us.

 

[Osamabindiesel]

It's simple. If Spurs don't match our valuation Ross should go nowhere (a little less is acceptable to get the deal but otherwise better to leave it). I'd rather we were spiteful and denied Spurs their man and destroyed Barkleys chances at the world cup. Harsh maybe but I only care about Everton and I'm happy for us to be perceived as the bad guys by some if that means clubs know they can't take the Mick out of us.

How you influence players to never sign for you again 101

 

[Goat]

It's simple. If Spurs don't match our valuation Ross should go nowhere (a little less is acceptable to get the deal but otherwise better to leave it). I'd rather we were spiteful and lost money to deny Spurs their man and destroy Barkleys chances at the world cup. Harsh maybe but I only care about Everton and I'm happy for us to be perceived as the bad guys by some if that means clubs and players alike know they can't take the mick out of us.

If you only care about Everton, why not just sell the player for 30m?

Cos I mean your way Everton loses, not only does it pay a player for 12months, but it then loses the 30m we could have got for the player 12months previously.

Its in Evertons best interests to sell the player for 30m and move on.

 

[Gwladysstreetlad]

How you influence players to never sign for you again 101

So you reckon it would be better to just let him go then and let Barkley and Spurs take us to the cleaners?

 

[Osamabindiesel]

So you reckon it would be better to just let him go then and let Barkley and Spurs take us to the cleaners?

We aren't a perennial top 4 club, and until we are we have to be player frandly. We cannot get away with ruining careers until our name becomes so big players have no choice but to be wowed by our sexy

 

[Toffeepot]

Quotes today of 25-30 million in line of the discount we gave UNT on Lukaku as for the add ons they have never been published as yet so it could be a 25 million loss!

not a 25mil loss at all...he came through the academy... and I think 25mil is about fair for a lad in his last year of contract who doesn't want to stay at the club

 

[Joey66]

not a 25mil loss at all...he came through the academy... and I think 25mil is about fair for a lad in his last year of contract who doesn't want to stay at the club

You have to ask WHY?????

 

[Goat]

You have to ask WHY?????

Hi Joey, what point are you attempting to make here?

I await your reply.

 

[Toffeepot]

You have to ask WHY?????

no I don't! There are many at the club who want to be there so he's the odd one out... 25mil would be fine by me... would prefer if he signed but caring less by the day and less about the reasons too...he's not consistent enough to be the main man in that position

 

[Gwladysstreetlad]

We aren't a perennial top 4 club, and until we are we have to be player frandly. We cannot get away with ruining careers until our name becomes so big players have no choice but to be wowed by our sexy

Telling Chelsea were to go the season before last over Stones didn't seem to hurt us did it?