Newcastle's form coming into our game was 6 losses and 1 draw in the last 7 games, 3 consecutive home losses in a row, scored 6, conceded 17, minus 11 goal difference over the past 7 games
Huddersfields away form coming into our game was, 4 losses in a row, scored 0 goals, conceded 14, throw in there 3 prior away games into that form and in the past 7 away games prior to playing us they had lost 5 drawn 2, scored 0 goals, conceded 16, minus 16 goal difference over there past 7 away games.
West Broms form coming into our game - no wins in the past 17 league games, 4 draws - 4 losses at home, failed to score in 5 of the last 9 games. failed to score in 3 of the last 4 games, 2 draws 2 losses.
so you think we shouldn't have went into those games with any new permanent manager fully expecting usn to get a result mate?
Whose cryarsing about BFS - i'm pointing out simple facts which show that what he has done so far should be the minimal benchmark we set for a manager in terms of results, especially from a new manager coming in which the usual bounce that a team gets from that.
Put this into some context as you seemed to believe we where going down and have been saved by Allardyce, we had a car crash of a season under Koeman, a ridiculous period of uncertainty under Unsworth, and yet when Alalrdyce sat down and had his first training session and took charge of his first match with the team, the team was actually sat in 13th position - 5 points away from the relegation zone and fresh off the back of smashing West Ham 4-0
and before you say - that was because of Allardyce, no it wasn't - it was because we had finally ended the uncertainty and some players finally pulled their fingers out knowing a new manager was in charge, Allardyce had absolutely zero to do with that result, it could have been any manager appointed of a semi decent level which would have achieved that bounce effect