Kenny and to a less extent Holgate are mainly playing out of pure necessity.
But if he didn't trust youngsters he'd have been rotating Jagielka, Williams and Keane at centre back and had Niasse starting ahead of DCL up front.
Erm... that's a bit of nonsense to be fair mate. He's played and brought through youngsters at every club he's been at, two are staples in our first team right now and they couldn't get a game under the big fat Dutchman.
But if he didn't trust youngsters he'd have been rotating Jagielka, Williams and Keane at centre back and had Niasse starting ahead of DCL up front.
I didn't say he didn't trust them I'm just saying he always sounds reluctant but forced into using them. Jags, Williams and more so Keane have been injury prone. Baines being crocked means we now have 1 RB so Kenny has to play every game.
In fairness, I'm not totally against Walcott. I think the squad will benefit from having him here as he's an upgrade on Lennon, Mirallas and probably Bolasie too. His pace and goalscoring will be most welcome.
How has a 26 year old striker got no resale value??? It irritates me when people exaggerate to suit their agenda.Exactly - if I were to be lining up players in order of useless performances it would be topped by our senior pros.
Fact is Allardyce doesn't trust young players - never has, never will.
Playing a youngster is a huge risk. £20m+ signings on £100k plus a week, with no resale value is fine if you give no thought to next season or the season after.
Only hope is we get him (and Walsh) out before they do too much damage.
Im OK with Lennon and Walcott as being sunken costs. In no way did we need Bolasie, that one still irks me massively.As I am sure you'll agree that is the issue.
He is a an upgrade on the 3 similarly aged players we already have at the club.
We paid £25m for Bolasie 18 months ago and we are upgrading him.
We paid £4m for Lennon a year before that.
Wages and fees between the 3 of them probably near £100m over their contracts and in 2 years time they'll all need replacing/upgrading and we won't be getting any fees back for selling them.
Compare with signing Lukaku, we got 4 years out of him and trebled our money.
Not really mate. It helped that both played a big part in the 4-0 West Ham game which was the first he watched. Baines and Keane were both injured so he had no option but to run with Kenny and Holgate, both of whom have been our best defenders since he joined. Kenny will be dropped as soon as Coleman is back, in the same way that DCL was when Cenk came in and Davies was when McCarthy was fit. A less than fit Bolasie is keeping Vlasic and Lookman out of the team, and Bene is nowhere near getting a look in now despite having a 5 game cameo in which he looked our most accomplished CM (plus that fraud Schneids starting most weeks). Plus Martina is playing 90 mins of every single game and completely upsetting the balance of the team, and not once has he considered bringing somebody through from the youth set up to at least give it a look. I guarantee you a manager like Klopp, or Ferguson, or Poch, or Pep would have done so.Erm... that's a bit of nonsense to be fair mate. He's played and brought through youngsters at every club he's been at, two are staples in our first team right now and they couldn't get a game under the big fat Dutchman.
Is money helpful in winning trophies?
So giving Vlasic and Lookman more game time to develop them, which is what we've been talking about here, is going to cost us 3 points every time we play them?.They will get game time. Just not when every little mistake they'll make will more than likely cost us 3 points at the moment.
And even then he's got Holgate, Kenny, Davies, DCL playing pretty regular or in the squad to make a contribution.
We throw Vlasic and Lookman into that, that's 6 under 23 outfielders. No team does that.
And it won't "win" us anything. What it'll bring in is transfer money when they're sold if they're any good.
No, what I am saying is that he should get some time. British manager's are somehow second class these days. If City treated their manager the way United treated Moyes he would not be there now. The league positions seem to be more governed by finance than managerial talent. All I am saying is that the better British people should get the time and shots at the top jobs. I think both Allardyce and Moyes are as good a bet as any with their respective budgets and am happy to wait and see. Could be right or wrong, we never really know in advance do we?You’re arguing that as British managers are the most successful and Allardyce is British we should give him a go. The most accurate way of assessing Allardyce’s potential isn’t his nationality it’s his lengthy managerial track record. Given that his track record is extremely average I’d say there’s no reason why we should give him a go and every reason why we should sack him at the end of the season.
@Timak said he didn't trust youngsters, and never has done. It's a claim based on absolutely nothing.
Bolton - Kevin Nolan, Nicky Hunt, Vaz Te, Joey O'Brien
Blackburn - Phil Jones, Grant Hanley, Steven N'Zonzi, Junior Hoilett
West Ham - Ravel Morrison, James Tomkins
Sunderland - Jordan Pickford, Duncan Watmore
Young players he's either given debuts to or made key members of his teams. Whatever you think of him and his tactics, fine, I get it, but it's just false to say he's never played youngsters or doesn't trust them.