Transfer Rumour Sandro Ramirez

[cromofo]

i'm numb

 

[admirschleck]

Oh, it's just a jarg twitter account everyone's believing because it's in other language. Like, Everton alone has even "verified sources" on that social network who constantly chat [Poor language removed] and nonsense and we're going to believe 9k followed Spanish twitter account? For real lads?

 

[ProZ]

ANNOUNCE THE THING FFS
ME HEADS HANGING ON BY A THREAD.

 

[AmericanBlue]

Do you want to sound like you understand contract law...

Do you want to sound like you've got the 'insider info' on clauses...

Do you want to add no value to 300 pages of drivel, but appear confident and knowledgable....

Haha guys? Shall we call him? Hahah let's call Saul? Does anyone have his number??

 

[AdaBrummieblue]

I cant believe people think Everton would insert a clause.

I've just said this. (To the boss man). Why would we? It's New Everton now.

 

[Tubey]

To be fair I've been guaranteed bu my mate all day, he works for the echo though it's 100% done I just hope they announce soon or I will stick to my word and leave haha!

There's your problem right there mate.

Basically means you should assume the opposite of anything he says ever is true.

 

[Yankfootball1]

Me too.

If Madrid didnt have a ban, we wouldnt have got him in a month of Sundays anyrate. The buy out of £5m is peanuts these days.

He might give us an excellent year, and assuming our buyout after 1 year is ok, then why fret? He might actually prefer to stay, or Madrid dont fancy him in 12 months.

Deal in the present.

It is amazing how worked up some people get when they don't know the facts on anything. Maybe there is a release clause only to Athletico and only for 30 Million. Would that be awful - probably not. Maybe there is no release clause. As you said if there was no Athletico ban we likely wouldn't get a sniff. It is one more way certain posters will use incomplete information to fuel a preconceived idea about positive or negative merits of the club.

 

[Tubey]

I mean it's crap if it's true but 'deeply disappointed' is a bit much isn't it? He's only a footballer.

Nah, not at the prospect of losing a player before he joins who I had no clue about a month ago - more at the club allowing itself to have such a clause to exist in the contract of an unproven 21 year old footballer.

The bigger clubs simply wouldn't have allowed it, and I hoped we were/are moving beyond the Deulofeu-ish nonsense.

If he does well, it just hangs like a cloud over us. Even with Lukaku we didn't have something that absurd in the deal.

 

[IllinoisBlue]

i can't believe people thought he'd actually sign without a clause.

The clause is you can leave for free after 4 years.

 

[blue4eva77]

He may have a clause, but I highly doubt that Everton will give him a small release fee in just 12-months, they'll be fully aware of Atletico's interest.

The clause could be anything, but he will defo have one.

 

[Yankfootball1]

The problem is he turns out to be perfect for us, and then we have to spend next summer finding a replacement. Which, let's be honest, is not easy.

Or a bigger problem is he doesn't sign with Everton - goes back to Malaga for 6 months and we make no money off of him.

 

[trueblue84]

 

[maccavennie]

I'm crying and shaking here lads

CRYIN N SHAKIN AND NOBODY CARES!!!!

 

[ham2]

ANNOUNCE THE THING FFS
ME HEADS HANGING ON BY A THREAD.

Still?

 

[Somerset Blue]

This is stupendous, don't want it to end!
There ain't no Sanity Clause!