I thought they looked goosed with 20/25 minutes to go and at that point was calling for a sub. After that I thought they got a second wind and were on top again. We were causing them problems with the way Iwobi was dropping into spaces and playing little triangles down that right hand side, and overloading on that flank was creating space on the other side for McNeil. Gray would have run at them more but not linked up in the same way (or at all if his other 50 odd appearances for us are anything to go off) so in my opinion it would have had a pretty big effect on how we played. Even so, like I said, I can totally get on board with people saying 'personally i'd have changed it' just not 'oh my god he's an absolute clown he cost us 2 points by not changing it' because I just don't see any reasonable basis for coming to that conclusion whatsoever. It may well have been worth twisting, but there's absolutely no way it was the glaringly obvious thing to do that would inevitably have meant we won, which is how many people are putting it across. Again, if we were struggling then i'd be agreeing 100% but we weren't, and I honestly don't think i've ever heard people claim that the best thing to do when doing well is change it until this week.