Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My biggest concern is how his rigidity (be that out of choice/preference, necessity or his limitations) mean that we can only play one way - counter-attack.I don’t like how we play. How we play has been fairly effective though. The results should catch up if we keep doing it and try to improve where we can. It’s impossible to say if it’ll be enough when the points are being taken away but if they aren’t it definitely will be. We might be fine anyway on account of some other sides being exceptionally bad.
Only two were down to Lampard, Dyche has lost the other 9, including todayHome form will do for him when we are eventually in a position to think about changing manager. It's simply not acceptable to have the worst home return in a calendar year in our history (even if a few of those were Fan-friendly Frank's).
I don’t like how we play. How we play has been fairly effective though. The results should catch up if we keep doing it and try to improve where we can. It’s impossible to say if it’ll be enough when the points are being taken away but if they aren’t it definitely will be. We might be fine anyway on account of some other sides being exceptionally bad.
Bound to play on there mindsEven today we made a load of chances and should have went in level at the break. It's not he easiest on the eye, but as you say it is the most effective football we've seen for a while.
My worry going forward is the point deduction getting stuck in our heads and affecting performances. We can't afford a few weeks to sort things out given we're already 5 points behind Luton.
Don’t disagree, we should be trying to develop the passing game more and that’s the part I don’t like about how we play. I do think the part about the chances is the key though. It can work better and in time it should. We were desperately unlucky to not score once again and while there is some skill level issue there we aren’t this bad at finishing. I mean they can’t be. They’re still PL players.My biggest concern is how his rigidity (be that out of choice/preference, necessity or his limitations) mean that we can only play one way - counter-attack.
While this has shown success away from home, we're not playing in a way at home that generates the results. We've got one way, and that's it.
Now don't me wrong, this squad has limitations and that may play into his thinking somewhat, but surely it's worth making some adaptations to our home game.
Teams sit deep, let us have the ball, and we end up just going side to side, back and forth without really looking threatening for large swathes of a game.
Again, admittedly, we do make some chances, and they should be getting buried, but that's often because teams have enough players back.
For me, we have to do something different at home. My son's U8 side can do it, so I do think it's not impossible for some professionals, albeit it may be difficult.
They’ve been surprisingly adept at getting into the positions this year imo. From guys like Gana and Doucoure who haven’t been known for it their entire careers too.Poor finishing is always going to be a problem because our players are not good at shooting or getting into scoring positions
I think the number of chances we make and the relative quality of them (err, hate to say xG) suggest you’re correct. We’ve had the opportunities.They’ve been surprisingly adept at getting into the positions this year imo. From guys like Gana and Doucoure who haven’t been known for it their entire careers too.