davek
Player Valuation: £150m
Or we could not go to kirkby an rot at goodison. Theirs no other options in the pipeline.
Get it!!
There was an exclusivity agreement in order preventing dialogue on that...get it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or we could not go to kirkby an rot at goodison. Theirs no other options in the pipeline.
Get it!!
He's asked you some decent questions Neiler, and you've ducked them. Says it all really.
If I say 'yes, I get it', will you leave me alone and bother someone else?Yes but that hasnt stoped other parties coming up with [Poor language removed] idea's that wont work.
Theirs nothing else in the pipeline dave.....get it!!
There was an exclusivity agreement in order preventing dialogue on that...get it?
To the point as usual Dave I would rep you(green) but got spread it aroundSo do dog turds.
For how long? - Bearing in mind the stadium issue isn't anything new.
And during that process, we have Warren Bradley claiming he has loads of ideas, in particular a stadium share
Bruce, if the Stadium guaranteed new investment, then that would help, but in order to do that, you have to ensure that the deal to build the new Stadium doesn't hamstring the earning potential of said investment (remember, we are stuck there for a minimum of 25 years) .
The current agreements around the limiting of large non-football uses to 6 per annum, in addition to the free and cut price arrangements with KMBC seriously limit the earning potential of the ground. Arrangements such as these will not help the marketability of the club.
It could, in fact be argued that the club is more saleable at the moment: £50M for the club as it stands, with the potential to make money out of a development of the new owners choosing, where future earning potential can be maximised, rather than limited; or £200M for the club with the revenue dead end which is the current redevelopment.
For how long? Funny you should ask that. It was yesterday revealed at the Inquiry that it lasted right up unitl 2 weeks ago and that this has now been replaced by a 'land agreement' between the three parties. So, to answer your question: Everton have been in handcuffs of their own making since the begining to end of this sorrry saga.
davek said:There was an exclusivity agreement in order preventing dialogue on that...get it?
I agree that Kirkby as a development doesn't set my heart racing but again we don't have the money to build the stadium we'd all like. I fear that doing nothing will be far more damaging than moving to Kirkby.
Thing is though Dave, believe it or not... there was the small issue of the stadium long, long before the 'sorry saga' of Kirkby. Back then, there was no exclusivity deal and now there is none. So to argue Everton prevented any dialogue with LCC;
Is staggering really. It really is. That excuse by LCC is damn right pathetic. Liverpool city council leader Warren Bradley In June 2007 "If Everton's deal with Knowsley falls through, I hope they will be able to discuss possibilities in Liverpool."
He then said "What we have got to is do all we can to retain Everton in Liverpool" Hes trying to do this alright. Make no mistake. See Bellefield redevelopment rejection.
He also confirmed that "Everton had been offered alternative sites within the city and the council was also searching for commercial partners".
So there we have it. The exclusivity deal made no odds as so called alternative sites had apparently been offered. He is also SEARCHING for commercial partners. Kind of like Kenwright searching for investment? No?
So, you wanted to prove you are really not interested in discussing this matter, just mouthing off club propaganda?Sums it up really mate!
So, you wanted to prove you are really not interested in discussing this matter, just mouthing off club propaganda?