kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
It was a covenant on a local park...a purely local skirmish that the Secretary of State deemed not important enough to require a call in. It was wrong of that LCC regime to break with the covenant, but there you go...that was the corrupt David Henshaw run authority for you. The Kirkby development breaks all regional and national planning guidelines and therefore was called in.
You (and the repugnant Chris Potts who knows better) are comparing apples and pears mate.
<cue chico on the delights of apple turnovers>
Yeah, I understand that, and I do know there's more to why it was called in than the Stanley Park. I wasnt comparing the two to say why the [Poor language removed]'s hasnt been called in but mearly pointing out that LCC tend to have red-tinted specs.
While not comparing the level of severity bewtween the two, its still a relevant point (and amusing one). The fact that LCC are examining a witness and mention about the planning laws in context to Kirkby and then be pulled up about Stanley Park's rule bending is funny. Aint the L1 complex a massive planning no-no too?
But [Poor language removed] happens dont it.