The fact that he's done it TWICE before is ample justification for a significantly increased punishment this time. That's a basic premise of any disciplinary or legal system. By suggesting that you think he should not get any longer a ban than last time, you are setting a "price" for players to behave this way, and Suarez has already demonstrated that he thinks it's a relative bargain. You are in fact condoning his behaviour.
If you were a player and another player bit you, you would want the book thrown at him. If you were a coach and one of your players did that, I imagine you would immediately sub him off and tell him to take a month or two off. If your child did that to another child in a game, you'd be mortified and if another child did it to yours, I bet you'd need to be restrained from inflicting physical harm - particularly if you knew that the child in question had done it TWICE before.
Anything other than a lengthy, global ban would be indefensible. I fail to see how anyone could conjure up a punishment that could be objectively viewed as "excessive" in this case. Your contrary opinion is something that, quite frankly, you should be ashamed of.
