Summer 2018 Transfer Window

[blue to the bone]

Jack Wilshire ability wise is an excellent player.. But injuries have stalled his progress and development. On huge wages I don't think he is worth the risk. But he is better than a lot of what we have for sure

 

[CielosGrises]

What you get for free you pay for in wages, no bargains to be had in this league - pay for what you need.

 

[Stephenlloyd]

I’d take Wilshere on a free. Not a position we vitally need, but he’s certainly talented and when a player like that becomes available you should go for them.

It’s a position we need 100%. Not saying Wilshire is that player. But getting a midfielder that can pass the ball is a must this summer.

 

[Brisan123]

I’m confused

I’m guessing so is he and he meant Wiltshire

 

[Stephenlloyd]

Gueye sitting in front of defence, Wilshire as our creative player, and a steady calm head next to him which is likely to be Schneiderlin tbh. If he could regain form, that'd be a good central midfield as long as we use our wingers well. That said, we need a second creative midfielder because you simply cannot count on Wilshire to play 38 games, yet you cannot pass up the chance to sign him on a free.

That’s a poor midfield. And did you listen to Silva’s press conference? When he mentioned his number 6 and how important it was. And name checked Schneiderlin. Gana won’t be sitting in front of the defence.

 

[SiEdmo]

Wilshire is a must-buy.

Probably a 5-million signing fee. Sell Klaassen and give Wilshire his salary.

He's a <20m player any day of the week.

Initial two-year deal, option of a third.

I agree he is a less than 20m pound player

 

[Brisan123]

Nah we shouldn’t have.

He’s limited and very baLd.

Fixed that for you

 

[kenada_blue]

Get. Jack. In.

 

[RomanReigns]

remember that time jack wilshere bossed the midfield against us?

yeah neither do i

 

[Brisan123]

Chelsea bought a crocked Barkley. City are now a cut above, but don't forget they have signed some real hospital cases in the past - Rodwell, Lescott, Delph, Sinclair, Kompany. I think this suggests that if they wanted him they would go for him, but to replace or cover for whom in their squad. We have needed creativity for eons in midfield and if it is a punt and works out, so what. If it does not, it is better to have tried and failed than to have never tried at all.

Or we could try something daft like signing a play who is just as good if not better who is not made of glass
Just a thought

 

[Thomasc]

Has anybody said Wilshere “not good enough” yet?

 

[Brisan123]

Now then, I should make it clear, that I don’t think Wilshere is that bad a player, but I just don’t think he’d be worth the wage he would definitely demand.

That and I can’t cope with idiots calling him Wiltshire every single time.

Blame autocorrect for the last bit

 

[Brisan123]

Wilshire is a must-buy.

Probably a 5-million signing fee. Sell Klaassen and give Wilshire his salary.

He's a <20m player any day of the week.

Initial two-year deal, option of a third.

Did you ever go for the pint with Boss Rarkley
How did you get on ??

 

[kenada_blue]

Or we could try something daft like signing a play who is just as good if not better who is not made of glass
Just a thought

He played about 30+ games last season and the season before that.

It's the same that was said about Walcott. Injury prone and not good enough

 

[evertonarntwe]

people are blagging he's a lot more prone than he actually is, he's played 20+ games for 5 out of the last 6 seasons ( 30+ in 3 of those )

waste of money?

weve got klaasan niasse sandro bolasie Williams rooney all on the payroll who offer absolute ZERO to the club, absolutely nothing
at least with wilshere you KNOW when he plays he'll be good, it's a slight risk giving his record, but he's free and proven, is it no more of a risk going and signing a klaasan from abroad who turns out to be absolutely shabite?

hope we get him