Zatara
Player Valuation: £100m
Shut up Zat.
He gets people off their seat because he's lost the ball within 10 seconds of getting it and everyone is fuming.
Someones never seen lookman play/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shut up Zat.
He gets people off their seat because he's lost the ball within 10 seconds of getting it and everyone is fuming.
My mistake, he's already been compared to David Beckham a few pages back.Dowell is essentially Zidane
Yeah mate, that'll be you given your recent posts about him.Someones never seen lookman play/
I mean, yea but also not really? Most of our targets that we got really only had us as an option. But we still lost Rom, we still have nobody who can be called a playmaker, we have no backup to our 30+ year old LB, our left sided CB is out for a year and we have 2 players out wide with pace.
I don't discount that we've brought in some good players, but these 2 are pretty much the bigger pieces that need to be made(and Im not saying they should necessarily be THESE two) and we are about 10 days before the start of the season and a BRUTAL fixture opening and you're saying 'we need to be patient'. In any other year, sure, since we didn't play 5 of the top 6 in our first 6 matches. But winning begets winning and losing begets losing and we need to be off to a flyer.
Imagine a 25-year old Gaz in the squad sweet Jesus he'd be worth £100m.
We don't need a back up striker we need a boss first team striker!!!Arsenal only want 13m for Lucas perez decent back up striker?
We shall see, won't we?Matic is a good player for sure, but I'd hardly call £40 million for a 29 year old the snip of the season. I'd say Sandro will comfortably win that one.
2nd rate you are joking right !!!
Yeah mate, that'll be you given your recent posts about him.
Please name 5 players that can perform in all 3 positions at an acceptable level to crack the Top 6 this season
That's central midfield btw.
We play Untied who will be playing a new cb (who looks alarmingly 'john stones like') a new centre mid in matic and a new striker.
Chelsea will be starting a new striker, new centre back and a new centre mid as well as being missing Hazzard for our game
City - two new fullbacks a new keeper probably a new centre back and god knows how many other changes by the time the window shuts
So three of those 4 tough games are against teams that have had a massive upheaval of the cores of their squads as well
Spurs - lets see how their first few games go before worrying about them - Wembley could give them a horrible seasons start
and we only play 4 of the opening 6 games against top 6 from last year mate, the other two games are Stoke and Bournemouth
about those fixtures as well, United, City and Chelsea away, Spurs at home - we only actually lost one of those games last season - and in 3 of those 4 games we basically played with 10 men as Lukaku didn't even bother showing up
I didn't say he was....some of the posters in here @MorgsGoat included need to brush up on their English....hes a of a similar or the same ilk means the same type of player or a similar type of player...In the sense of him bringing excitement
ilk
(ɪlk)
n
1. a type; class; sort (esp in the phrase of that, his, her, etc, ilk): people of that ilk should not be allowed here.
2. of that ilk Scot of the place of the same name: used to indicate that the person named is proprietor or laird of the place named: Moncrieff of that ilk.
[Old English ilca the same family, same kind; related to Gothic is he, Latin is, Old English gelīc like]
Usage: Although the use of ilk in the sense of sense 1 is sometimes condemned as being the result of a misunderstanding of the original Scottish expression of that ilk, it is nevertheless well established and generally acceptable
Someones never seen lookman play/