Install the app
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

 

Summer transfer window 2023

Status
Not open for further replies.
….it’s a good point but that would then be down to the players character. It’s a backward step but he might feel he has something to prove & he could be a key player at somewhere like Everton. He plays like football matters to him.

I know the clubs a mess but players from other clubs will know what our home/away support is like, they will talk to players from our club. I think we underplay ourselves at times. What new players will want to see is signs of progression in the team.
It’s about clear vision, isn’t it? As you say, he would be taking a step down in terms of glamour, but if you’re prepared to grasp the nettle and make the best of things, then why not?
 
It is not a shelf company, it is an active company but how does the ownership make any difference? The two Villa owners own all of the club and all of the stadium. If they wanted to sell VP they could. But how is that any different to Moshiri and Everton? If he wanted to sell the ground what is stopping him? And isn't he in the process of getting investment from MSP which will presumably give them some control over what happens the stadium. There is zero security that the stadium will remain part of EFC

A holding company no!

Exactly the club doesn’t own the ground the shareholders do privately. Aston Villa football club doesn’t own a ground, conceivably they can sell the club, keep the stadium or sell to a third party or level it and turn into an Aldi or apartments, if they wish. Charge the club rent etc.

We have two grounds at the moment, both owned by Everton football club, the second managed by Everton stadium company limited owned by Everton football club - not blue heaven holding - who hold Moshiris Everton shareholding.

Conceivably any majority shareholder can separate the ground from the club - but haven’t - wonder why……it’s toxic ESL stuff, your ownership in an outlier.

A question is to why - you may know more than me - but as you mentioned if administration was a risk - why not just give a shareholder loan to the club and turn into equity - if there was nothing but good intentions or more shares etc….

I mean why would they want the ground if their intentions aren’t beyond question over other ways of giving capital annd getting cash flow into the club.

Also who is paying for the stadium refurb will it be the shareholders privately or Aston Villa football club.

Also be interesting if Villa ever needed to raise finance and not having a ground as an asset.
 
Last edited:
With the board smothered in silence we need a signing to show intent that next season will be taken seriously

I don't hold out for much hope...
 

Off Topic
A holding company no!

Exactly the club doesn’t own the ground the shareholders do privately. Aston Villa football club doesn’t own a ground, conceivably they can sell the club, keep the stadium or sell to a third party or level it and turn into an Aldi or apartments, if they wish. Charge the club rent etc.

We have two grounds at the moment, both owned by Everton football club, the second managed by Everton stadium company limited owned by Everton football club - not blue heaven holding - who hold Moshiris Everton shareholding.

Conceivably any majority shareholder can separate the ground from the club - but haven’t - wonder why……it’s toxic ESL stuff, your ownership in an outlier.

A question is to why - you may know more than me - but as you mentioned if administration was a risk - why not just give a shareholder loan to the club and turn into equity - if there was nothing but good intentions or more shares etc….

I mean why would they want the ground if their intentions aren’t beyond question over other ways of giving capital annd getting cash flow into the club.

Also who is paying for the stadium refurb will it be the shareholders privately or Aston Villa football club.

Also be interesting if Villa ever needed to raise finance and not having a ground as an asset.
Ground ownership is a tricky one for the FA. A club should not be allowed to sell the ground to a 3rd party, that is just a disaster and will come back to bite. Villa sold the ground to themselves which is completely wrong from an FFP perspective but the rules allowed us to 'cheat' by doing so and the rules have since been changed to stop it from happening. As for raising finance, I would assume that would be easy enough if we are still in the PL but to date the owners don't use finance and have funded all investments themselves as equity, there is no debt from Villa to the owners (we are very lucky). when the ground was sold it only had a value of about 50m, I believe the ground is a protected building and it cannot be used for any other purpose so it has a minimal commercial value from an investment perspective as it cant become a block of flats or a Tesco etc.
 
Dumfries went for 25m. We spent 1.7m that summer and still have ended up with FFP charges. The reason we didn't sign him is nothing to do with whether he was or wasn't good enough.
I know the details , and believe it or not there was a possibility to get that deal done , the manager and bizzarly a lot of the fanbase didn't think he was good enough lol.

That was my reference There.
 

I know the details , and believe it or not there was a possibility to get that deal done , the manager and bizzarly a lot of the fanbase didn't think he was good enough lol.

That was my reference There.
If we were able to spend the 25m or whatever on Dumfries then even if we decided we didn't fancy him, why didn't we ultimately spend the money on someone else? Given what we now know about our FFP position over that period I don't understand how we could have made such a signing without pushing ourselves way over the line, unless it involved a sale of the similar value?
 
Ground ownership is a tricky one for the FA. A club should not be allowed to sell the ground to a 3rd party, that is just a disaster and will come back to bite. Villa sold the ground to themselves which is completely wrong from an FFP perspective but the rules allowed us to 'cheat' by doing so and the rules have since been changed to stop it from happening. As for raising finance, I would assume that would be easy enough if we are still in the PL but to date the owners don't use finance and have funded all investments themselves as equity, there is no debt from Villa to the owners (we are very lucky). when the ground was sold it only had a value of about 50m, I believe the ground is a protected building and it cannot be used for any other purpose so it has a minimal commercial value from an investment perspective as it cant become a block of flats or a Tesco etc.

I don’t share the nothing to see here take you take mate, but understand the hope for the best now it’s done approach, this is a very bad thing for Aston Villa football club in my opinion and for football over all that such a historic ground can be separated from a football club.

Everton have to raise 250 mill minimum to pay for our new ground, we have two fixed assets we can use as securing, the market won’t lend us 250 in the current market, so we need private investment of 100 mill from MSP to risk reduce and we can raise the final 150 mill. Villa without a fixed asset if in a similar position and need to raise funds - say for the redevelopment may struggle in the market.

Again ultimately Aston Villa football club don’t own a ground and are the mercy of shareholders who took the unusual step of separating the club from their ground, when they could have invested without that separation - it was unnecessary with alternatives therefore you have to query the motivation.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top