dholliday
deconstructed rep
Roberto's currently busy spending money from recent player sales, and from the TV money influx. The money is not owner backed investment, and not generated by commercial activity.
Anyone spinning this as a triumph of the board needs to take their head out of Bill's anus.
Do you have the figures that prove the Lukaku money isn't, at least partly, from owner-backed investment?
We got 28m for Fellaini last year, but spent most of it on Macca, Kone and others, plus the loanees had fees attached (Lukaku cost us around 3m, not including wages).
We've spent 32m on Besic and Lukaku, and invested in a heavily-impoved contract for Ross Barkley. We may yet still add to the squad.
This summer window is looking like a very healthy net spend, and even if we can explain the funds away by player sales and TV money, it can still be defined as partly "owner-backed". No board is obligated to spend their profits on player transfers.