Says absolutely nothing about current board members moving on...that slightly concerns me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Athletic reporting 25% is in line with what a lot have been reporting, not sure where Esk got his idea they would take a majority and control. The latter would be preferable but what matters most right now is getting it done and dusted.
Yes, good point. Sometimes letting a "caretaker" Manager "care-take", while you plan the next strategy is a good thing as well.To be fair though it has taken them half a season to get to that point though after getting rid of Conte.
I'm still waiting for Witsel to be oursWham, as usual
As usual it’s Wait and See with Everton
Surely it's what role any new boardroom additions have.Runs in contrast to reports of a majority MSP stake.
Esk saying that initial discussions about stadium funding developed further when Moshiri raised the need for funds elsewhere.
Diluting Moshiri to below 50% heads off any threat to the club if he was to be sanctioned.
A threat to MSP would be removed.
Also the Blythe Capital / AJ Bell / George Downing involvement to consider.
We do need the whole existing board removed and replaced. 2 MSP appointees on their own is just papering over the cracks and it seems they have recognised that as well.
Go Figure, it was The Esk, we are talking about!Surely that article contradicts what The Esk himself suggested the other day about the shares being reshuffled?
Oh, he doesnt believe!!