So what you really mean is that you are going to ignore and disregard any evidence that is put in front of you, so that you can make your own conclusions based on nothing but your own opinion. You aren't alone in doing this, lots of Evertonians are ignoring the reports stating that even the club finishing bottom is going to receive an extra 14-20million pounds, and the reports aren't even taking into account all the foreign TV deals.
The USA deal alone has gone from 23million dollars to 250 million dollars. A club like Everton is on target to receive AT LEAST an extra 30 million.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ize-money-for-next-seasons-title-winners.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/13/premier-league-tv-rights-3-billion-sky-bt
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...t--if-its-not-all-spent-on-wages-8647005.html
Other club's revenues, whether they be through sponsorship or otherwise, are irrelevant when we are discussing how much extra money Everton are going to receive and what Everton are going to spend their extra money on.
It's like Evertonians have become conditioned to instantly create excuses as to why the money won't be spent on squad improvement. You say that the money will be used to decrease the debt, but our debt is comparably small, we will stop making losses (until we spend our extra money) and history shows that the debt is actually likely to INCREASE when are revenues have gone up.
But more importantly, it is the players on the pitch that really determine the state of the club. Paying off 10 million pound in debt is of little use if it sees you drop 5 places down the league; you end up getting less prize money and it becomes even more difficult to attract top players in the future.
All I want is for people to acknowledge that THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE, and that our revenue is expected to increase by at least 30million pound a year, and that the extra revenue is going to have to be spent one way or another.
I'm not being moody here by the way, just putting my point across.