This nurse Letby case

Ok thanks.

That sounds like the jury were all over the place to me. They weren't to blame though, the ropiness of a lot of the evidence sounds like it's left them unable to agree on most charges.

Hell of a lot of evidence and such to sift through, plus it's hard to reconcile the heinous nature of those acts with the person sitting in front of you I imagine.

I'm a long way removed from any level of expertise or insight, but I expect the whole thing has been incredibly traumatic.
 
One of the 'survivors'. Utterly heartbreaking stuff:

One of the babies was the size of an adult hand, weighing just over 535g (1lb), when she was born 15 weeks premature and given a 5% chance of survival. Letby tried to kill the girl twice – the first attempt just hours after she and the family had marked her 100th day of life with a celebratory cake, and the second on what would have been her due date two weeks later. Letby was found not guilty of a third count of attempted murder against her.

The little girl, known as Child G, was diagnosed with quadriplegic cerebral palsy after the attacks. Now eight, she is nil by mouth and requires 24-hour care.
 

Cheers. Less suspicious if they were her targets. Certainly adds more weight to her being guilty when convicted as that is very much premeditated and a calculated risk.

I'm sure I read earlier that this unit has lost only one baby since she was removed from her position but I could be wrong.

There is a misconception about how at risk premature babies are - my sister is a neonatal specialist, primarily dealing in substance addicted newborns. I caution that I try and follow the stuff that she tells me but I have the attention span and intellect of a mudskipper.

However, prem. babies have a very, very good survival rate in the UK. I'll be certain to speak with her about this case when next catch up, but I have a real impression that the number of deaths should have been alerting to a number of professionals.
 

There is a misconception about how at risk premature babies are - my sister is a neonatal specialist, primarily dealing in substance addicted newborns. I caution that I try and follow the stuff that she tells me but I have the attention span and intellect of a mudskipper.

However, prem. babies have a very, very good survival rate in the UK. I'll be certain to speak with her about this case when next catch up, but I have a real impression that the number of deaths should have been alerting to a number of professionals.
It seems they were. But the exec board acted properly strangely.
 
There is a misconception about how at risk premature babies are - my sister is a neonatal specialist, primarily dealing in substance addicted newborns. I caution that I try and follow the stuff that she tells me but I have the attention span and intellect of a mudskipper.

However, prem. babies have a very, very good survival rate in the UK. I'll be certain to speak with her about this case when next catch up, but I have a real impression that the number of deaths should have been alerting to a number of professionals.

Oh I'm not saying the number shouldn't have been alerting; I was more saying it must surely looks less out of the ordinary for a prem baby to suddenly die/collapse than an on-time baby.
 

Welcome to GrandOldTeam

Get involved. Registration is simple and free.

Back
Top