TNT sports

[heatmeiser]

Why give them your money? Most of it will end up in the pockets of the euro brands.

If you aren't paying £70 a year for IPTV then you're doing life in general very wrong

 

[Wizard]

I'm not crying. Emotion doesn't come into it. Then again I don't live in a metropolis so my drinking water isn't tainted with those female hormones that amass in metropolitan water supplies - so I don't get emotional often and irrational never.

Many women objectify themselves - they spend hours obsessing about appearance, photographing themselves, videoing their vacant lives and publish their works to get responses ... and then cry misogyny as soon as any comment cones in that they're not in the mood for.

I have heard a wolf whistle only once in my nearly 60 years, walking down a street where there was a (am I allowed to say pretty? ) girl also walking. I've seen plenty of other girls walking down the street who have not been whistled. Is it as big a thing as the media constantly go on about? Or is it being exaggerated fir attention. Again - I can see why some women don't like this attention and its certainly not a thing i would do, but I also know of some characters (female) who actually enjoyed it. I expect (based on what these women have said to me) that a lot of the bawling about how horrendous such a thing is comes from the baying crones who are jealous that they never receive such attention. Who knows.

And yet again .... the female vote. It was only 4 or 5 years before women were given the vote that the vote was given to MOST men. Before that you would have had to have been very monied and or titled to have a vote in the UK. But let's forget the facts and go along with the misandry filling the media shall we and stick with the story of male suppression of females. Wouldn't wish to think of the jobs men were excluded from due to nothing more than rank and station, and the endless wars they were sent to or dangerous mine working they were forced into ... its only about how bad women had it before many today were born.

Wow. Using a thread about female presenters of a sports channel to air some of your grievances with women is pretty special. I say some because I'm guessing there are more.

 

[chrismpw]

If you aren't paying £70 a year for IPTV then you're doing life in general very wrong

I have no idea what this is! I've only just accepted qobuz music streaming as a thing.

 

[Raino85]

I'm not crying. Emotion doesn't come into it. Then again I don't live in a metropolis so my drinking water isn't tainted with those female hormones that amass in metropolitan water supplies - so I don't get emotional often and irrational never.

Many women objectify themselves - they spend hours obsessing about appearance, photographing themselves, videoing their vacant lives and publish their works to get responses ... and then cry misogyny as soon as any comment cones in that they're not in the mood for.

I have heard a wolf whistle only once in my nearly 60 years, walking down a street where there was a (am I allowed to say pretty? ) girl also walking. I've seen plenty of other girls walking down the street who have not been whistled. Is it as big a thing as the media constantly go on about? Or is it being exaggerated fir attention. Again - I can see why some women don't like this attention and its certainly not a thing i would do, but I also know of some characters (female) who actually enjoyed it. I expect (based on what these women have said to me) that a lot of the bawling about how horrendous such a thing is comes from the baying crones who are jealous that they never receive such attention. Who knows.

And yet again .... the female vote. It was only 4 or 5 years before women were given the vote that the vote was given to MOST men. Before that you would have had to have been very monied and or titled to have a vote in the UK. But let's forget the facts and go along with the misandry filling the media shall we and stick with the story of male suppression of females. Wouldn't wish to think of the jobs men were excluded from due to nothing more than rank and station, and the endless wars they were sent to or dangerous mine working they were forced into ... its only about how bad women had it before many today were born.

Wow!!!!

I suppose you have never experienced racism in your 60 years also mate, so that means it doesn't exist!

 

[chrismpw]

Wow. Using a thread about female presenters of a sports channel to air some of your grievances with women is pretty special. I say some because I'm guessing there are more.

I have no issue with women in general any differently from men. I prefer talking to and listening to men, generally, because I tend to find what they talk about more interesting or amusing. If a woman shares my interests and has humour then that's great.

In general to my ears they tend to talk over excitedly about themselves or people they know a lot - and that doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm not saying it's inferior, I'm just saying it leaves me bored stiff. I'm not saying its all of them - I'm happy to say I've met a good number if women I'm happy to listen to for hours.

I WILL admit to an irrational dislike. Some of potentially the best female commentators I've heard are in cricket; istenable to voice, calm, measured, insightful and technical. However, in test match cricket I want to hear this. I want to hear old duffers talking rubbush about buses, pigeons on the pitch and cake. I want to hear them gently winding one another up and having a laugh. I don't want endless analysis like the women feel the need to do just justify their spot in the box.

 

[Nymzee]

Chris going full on incel on a Wednesday morning

 

[mightymoyes]

Are the commentators female? OP just talks about presenters.

no, darren 'fletch' fletcher is still lead commentator unfortunately. the misogynists just want to vent their ignorance

 

[Nymzee]

no, darren 'fletch' fletcher is still lead commentator unfortunately. the misogynists just want to vent their ignorance

Absolute pube that lad

 

[chrismpw]

Wow!!!!

I suppose you have never experienced racism in your 60 years also mate, so that means it doesn't exist!

Interestingly enough, the 5 minutes of women's hour I heard today on a journey were doing as you ... putting racism and misogyny into the same basket in order to weopsnisw them against the male establishment. They are separate issues and there I'd an enormous amount of irrefutable evidence over decades to show that racism is evil throughout humanity.

But then again, our media has an agenda to paint a picture if the repressive white man. Firstly it was very few white men (and their wives who were happy to benefit) that were involved in the slave trade. At this time there were many African tribes complicit and encouraging of the trade with Europeans and Americans- as those Africans, just like the Europeans, had relied on slaves themselves for generations.

It was rhe Europeans, white male Britains in particular, that led the way in putting an end to it. But if course, not for high moral reasons - it had to involve the then Prime Minister, son of a slave trader, benefitting personally more than anybody else in the country.

 

[Wizard]

I have no issue with women in general any differently from men. I prefer talking to and listening to men, generally, because I tend to find what they talk about more interesting or amusing. If a woman shares my interests and has humour then that's great.

In general to my ears they tend to talk over excitedly about themselves or people they know a lot - and that doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm not saying it's inferior, I'm just saying it leaves me bored stiff. I'm not saying its all of them - I'm happy to say I've met a good number if women I'm happy to listen to for hours.

I WILL admit to an irrational dislike. Some of potentially the best female commentators I've heard are in cricket; istenable to voice, calm, measured, insightful and technical. However, in test match cricket I want to hear this. I want to hear old duffers talking rubbush about buses, pigeons on the pitch and cake. I want to hear them gently winding one another up and having a laugh. I don't want endless analysis like the women feel the need to do just justify their spot in the box.

"I have no issues with women" and then you go on to list a number of issues with women.

 

[chrismpw]

"I have no issues with women" and then you go on to list a number of issues with women.

That's the subject of the discourse. When one says "in general" it very obviously implies that there are exceptions. I expanded on those exceptions. It's what conversation is. Seems to be an art we are losing?

 

[mightymoyes]

I have no issue with women in general any differently from men. I prefer talking to and listening to men, generally, because I tend to find what they talk about more interesting or amusing. If a woman shares my interests and has humour then that's great.

In general to my ears they tend to talk over excitedly about themselves or people they know a lot - and that doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm not saying it's inferior, I'm just saying it leaves me bored stiff. I'm not saying its all of them - I'm happy to say I've met a good number if women I'm happy to listen to for hours.

I WILL admit to an irrational dislike. Some of potentially the best female commentators I've heard are in cricket; istenable to voice, calm, measured, insightful and technical. However, in test match cricket I want to hear this. I want to hear old duffers talking rubbush about buses, pigeons on the pitch and cake. I want to hear them gently winding one another up and having a laugh. I don't want endless analysis like the women feel the need to do just justify their spot in the box.

you may hope GBNews gets the next test match rights deal then so small minded weirdos like you are catered for

 

[Raino85]

Interestingly enough, the 5 minutes of women's hour I heard today on a journey were doing as you ... putting racism and misogyny into the same basket in order to weopsnisw them against the male establishment. They are separate issues and there I'd an enormous amount of irrefutable evidence over decades to show that racism is evil throughout humanity.

But then again, our media has an agenda to paint a picture if the repressive white man. Firstly it was very few white men (and their wives who were happy to benefit) that were involved in the slave trade. At this time there were many African tribes complicit and encouraging of the trade with Europeans and Americans- as those Africans, just like the Europeans, had relied on slaves themselves for generations.

It was rhe Europeans, white male Britains in particular, that led the way in putting an end to it. But if course, not for high moral reasons - it had to involve the then Prime Minister, son of a slave trader, benefitting personally more than anybody else in the country.

Those 'Pesky Africans', creating slavery and all that!

Its a good job aul Winston Churchill stepped in and stopped it isn't it!

 

[chrismpw]

you may hope GBNews gets the next test match rights deal then so small minded weirdos like you are catered for

Small minded is taking a discussion and trying to make it personal with insults like you just did. I've heard if GB news, I've never been interested in watching it. Wrong in so many counts. Frankly I am disappointed in your generalisations. X

 

[chrismpw]

Those 'Pesky Africans', creating slavery and all that!

Its a good job aul Winston Churchill stepped in and stopped it isn't it!

Since humanity started in Africa and slavery was the consequence of losing battles between tribes, it is reasonable to assume that slavery did in fact start in Africa and spread North through Egypt and into Persia and Greece.

It wasn't Winston Churchill. Please go and get better educated on this topic before trying to argue points with me! Not that this is on topic at all.