Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one on the Davies side of the debate that I’ve seen here (apart from that posters father in law) thinks that Davies is definitely going to be an England international or anything like that (although there’s nothing to say he might not develop into one). The argument seems to be that he is a young player playing in a difficult position who seems to have impressed multiple managers and has the potential to improve as he is only 20. The other side of the argument claiming that he won’t make it as a premier league player and that he'll never be good enough is bizarre when he’s already played a season and a half in our first team in the premier league. I could buy an argument that says we need better, of course we do, Id love us to have an Arteta level first choice player for Davies to learn from, but to argue that he is not good enough for our squad or for the premier league is just over criticism for no real reason.
Looking forward to people missing the point of your post and crying about you comparing Davies to Zidane.When Luka Modric was 20 he was on loan at Inter Zapresic making 18 appearances in the season.
Toni Kroos at 20 was on loan at Bayer Leverkusen after having spent only one season in the first team at Bayern.
David Silva at 20 was on loan at Celta Vigo after spending the previous season on loan at Eibar.
Zidane at 20 had moved from Cannes to Bordeaux.
How come 4 of the best midfielders in European football in their respective periods have been allowed to be poor and inconsistent at 20 but Tom Davies isn’t? How come they all developed and improved past the age of 20 (in some cases a substantial amount) but it’s assumed by some that Tom Davies doesn’t have the tools to. Some might say ‘see he needs a loan’ but then you get back to the question of why messrs Koeman Allardyce Unsworth and Silva think differently and keep playing him in the first team of a top half premier league side.
Well, the fat one is the one who mostly represents the players who are phenomena's, and by that I mean already world class, by the age of 19.
The other Ronaldo, despite going to United at 18, didn't really make his mark on the world stage until he was 22. Bit of a slow burner by comparison.
Reckon Mbappe will turn out like the Fat Ronaldo personally, just like the other teen superstars Rooney and Maradona. The only exception I can think of is Pele.
When Luka Modric was 20 he was on loan at Inter Zapresic making 18 appearances in the season.
Toni Kroos at 20 was on loan at Bayer Leverkusen after having spent only one season in the first team at Bayern.
David Silva at 20 was on loan at Celta Vigo after spending the previous season on loan at Eibar.
Zidane at 20 had moved from Cannes to Bordeaux.
How come 4 of the best midfielders in European football in their respective periods have been allowed to be poor and inconsistent at 20 but Tom Davies isn’t? How come they all developed and improved past the age of 20 (in some cases a substantial amount) but it’s assumed by some that Tom Davies doesn’t have the tools to. Some might say ‘see he needs a loan’ but then you get back to the question of why messrs Koeman Allardyce Unsworth and Silva think differently and keep playing him in the first team of a top half premier league side.
So Modric wasn’t good enough for Zagreb, Kroos not good enough for Bayern, Silva not good enough for Valencia, and all 3 got loaned out? Maybe, just maybe Davies isn’t good enough for what people want to see out of Everton and like those other far superior talents wouldn’t be out of place on leaving and coming back at some point. We wouldn’t sign a Tom Davies to play in the first team right now, so why should people be happy with his recent performances just because he was a youth. Think he’s got all sorts of potential but he needs to start developing into something better than what we’ve seen. Don’t see how that’s having a pop at all.When Luka Modric was 20 he was on loan at Inter Zapresic making 18 appearances in the season.
Toni Kroos at 20 was on loan at Bayer Leverkusen after having spent only one season in the first team at Bayern.
David Silva at 20 was on loan at Celta Vigo after spending the previous season on loan at Eibar.
Zidane at 20 had moved from Cannes to Bordeaux.
How come 4 of the best midfielders in European football in their respective periods have been allowed to be poor and inconsistent at 20 but Tom Davies isn’t? How come they all developed and improved past the age of 20 (in some cases a substantial amount) but it’s assumed by some that Tom Davies doesn’t have the tools to. Some might say ‘see he needs a loan’ but then you get back to the question of why messrs Koeman Allardyce Unsworth and Silva think differently and keep playing him in the first team of a top half premier league side.
So Modric wasn’t good enough for Zagreb, Kroos not good enough for Bayern, Silva not good enough for Valencia, and all 3 got loaned out? Maybe, just maybe Davies isn’t good enough for what people want to see out of Everton and like those other far superior talents wouldn’t be out of place on leaving and coming back at some point. We wouldn’t sign a Tom Davies to play in the first team right now, so why should people be happy with his recent performances just because he was a youth. Think he’s got all sorts of potential but he needs to start developing into something better than what we’ve seen. Don’t see how that’s having a pop at all.
Who said they were poor and inconsistent? Did you watch any of them as 20-year olds?
So Modric wasn’t good enough for Zagreb, Kroos not good enough for Bayern, Silva not good enough for Valencia, and all 3 got loaned out? Maybe, just maybe Davies isn’t good enough for what people want to see out of Everton and like those other far superior talents wouldn’t be out of place on leaving and coming back at some point. We wouldn’t sign a Tom Davies to play in the first team right now, so why should people be happy with his recent performances just because he was a youth. Think he’s got all sorts of potential but he needs to start developing into something better than what we’ve seen. Don’t see how that’s having a pop at all.
What a weird post.I don’t understand the protection this lad gets but it’s maybe because I’m not scouse.
What a weird post.
Do you think fans born in Liverpool are biased towards our locally born players Nymz?
I'm sure if somebody analysed those posters who are "protecting" Tom on here, you would pretty much find a cross section geographically that matches the demographics of the forum as a whole.
I suspect you would also find that the same posters who are "protecting" Tom feel the same way towards other young Everton players, regardless of where they were born.
I think the one thing that most of us posters have in common is that we can't understand why practically all of our young players take so much stick on here whilst they are still developing, and why so many are written off before they're practically out of their teens.
Why would their teams loan them out if they were good and consistent?