I do beleive we at the very least 'wanted' him.
On loan perhaps. As a "prime transfer target" we're "missing out on" - that's utter nonsense to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do beleive we at the very least 'wanted' him.
On loan perhaps. As a "prime transfer target" we're "missing out on" - that's utter nonsense to me.
You are making yourself look a fool if you seriously think we weren't in for Shaqiri. If you think that then fair enough it's a free world but you are wrong.
Wait for the"we were never in for him" from RMlolAbsolute joke.
Just like Payet was rubbish too I suppose. But we have the god Naismith linking our play together.
If we don't get someone good squad wise we aren't better than about 10th in the league and that's if we play to our potential.
Because we're the bigger club. Objectively. We have the bigger capacity to offer the wages and the consistency in terms of achievement.
It's like saying if Chelsea and Swansea were in a straight race for a player, 99 times out of 100 if Chelsea identified him as a prime transfer target, they win that race.
Who do you think our prime transfer target is?
I was convinced it was him.
lollollollollol
Do you honestly think the players would consider that in this instance? It's not like Chelsea V Swansea, it's Everton V Stoke! Neither of us win anything, both outside the elite of the league and if anything they have more ambition than us.
I thought you were a sensible poster normally but that is absolutely side splittingly ridiculous!
Like others have said a player with some much quality is booted out if 2 huge clubs in a matter of 6 months does raise an issue. Although a good player it's does scream a bit if drenthe / van der meyde; maybe Hughes is the man to whip him into shape